om beter te weten waarover we hier spreken verwijzen we onze
nieuwsgierige lezertjes naar onze Top 90 bij Bloggen en zoals jullie
zullen merken staat daar ergens rond de 20ste plaats het blog
Medjugorje en we zijn zo goed om hier effe een directe link te leggen:
Deze
bijdrage heeft geenszins de bedoeling te spotten met personen die
geloven in dergelijke bedevaartsoorden en we willen zeker en vast niet
de goeie bedoelingen van de verantwoordelijken van dit blog in twijfel
trekken. Laat dit meteen voor iedereen duidelijk zijn. Wij zijn
ongelovigen maar wij hebben geen enkel probleem met het geloof van
anderen, zonder onderscheid tussen de verschillende godsdiensten. Wij
zijn voorstanders van een volledige godsdienstvrijheid. Dat is dan ook
maar meteen gezegd en gebeiteld. MAAR we willen wel wat kanttekeningen
aanbrengen bij sommige fenomenen zoals het bedevaartsoord Medjugorje.
We hebben hier eerder al een paar teksten gepubliceerd die verwijzen
naar de financiering van dit oord door plundergoud van het Kroatische
gruwelregime van de ustacha. Maar er is nog meer...en we zullen vanaf
hier nu al maar aankondigen dat we geen subsidies noch verzoekjes
hebben gekregen vanwege één of andere antichrist om deze bijdrage te
schrijven; We zijn er echter van overtuigd dat dit wel zal gezegd
worden door de fanclub van Medjugorje
Maar we zullen beginnen
met de woorden van die Weense kardinaal die nieuwjaar vierde ginder ter
plekke en die zo mooi verklaarde: "Ik geloof dat er in de Kerk vele
gebeurtenissen zijn, die vanuit menselijk standpunt ogenschijnlijk
onmogelijk lijken."
Welwelwel dat is nu eens mooi gezegd en met deze mooie uiytspraak in ons achterhoofdje beginnen we te spitten...
eerst en vooral gaan we op
zoek naar de man die dit allemaal van zeer dichtbij mocht meemaken
namelijk de devote levende heilige van deze plaats Franciskanerbroeder
Jozo Zovko en hier vinden jullie zijn stichtende verhaal:
Father
Jozo Zovko
O.F.M., a Franciscan priest has been a part of the history of the
phenomena of Medjugorje since the very beginning. As a young priest,
Father Jozo enjoyed the assignment as Parish Priest for the Saint James
Church in Medjugorje,
Bosnia-Hercegovina when the first apparition occurred on June 24, 1981.
When the children first started to speak of
the apparitions, Father Jozo was doubtful that it was more than the
excited imaginations of the young. Still, talk of the apparitions was
dangerous in an area of Communist oppression. He was torn between
trying to keep his parish and the suddenly arriving pilgrims calm and
centered and taking care of their spiritual needs and making sense out
of the stories of the apparitions.. if indeed they had occurred. It
wasn't long before he was convinced that the children were seeing the
Gospa and that something wonderful was happening to his St. James
parish that would soon affect the world through the Gospa's messages
given there.
Towards the end of July, 1981,
while Father Jozo was praying inside of St. James, he heard a male
voice tell him: "Go outside and protect the children.". Upon opening
the door of the church, he found all six visionaries,
Ivanka, Ivan, Jakov, Marija, Mirjana and Vicka frightened of the police
and begging for help. He gave them sanctuary in the rectory.
After refusing the order to close
St. James, Father Jozo Zovko was arrested on August 17, 1981.. barely
two months after the first apparition. He was tried and convicted on
charges of subversion against the (Communist) state. He was sentenced
to three and a half years hard labor.
Despite the many cruel and
horrendous tortures he endured while imprisoned, his faith remained
strong and grew. Unable to cope with such devoutness in the face of
their extensive cruelty as well as the increasing political pressure
against his imprisonment, the Communists released Father Jozo after 18
months on the condition he never return to St. James as pastor.
Father Jozo now travels through
the world and speaks of the Gospa's messages. He speaks of the
immeasurable love of Jesus and he asks us all to respond to the call
with all of our hearts. And he teaches these very things by his words
and his example.
One project that is very close to
Father Jozo's heart is taking care of the many children who became
orphans through the Bosnian War. He has established the non-profit
"International Godparenthood for the Herceg Bosnian Child." and all
fees from his speaking engagements go to help the orphans. You may find
a link to learn more about Father Jozo's Godparenthood program on our
Favorite Links page. Father Jozo Zovko
O.F.M. is also author of the book "as she asks" with Geraldine Hemmings
and Carrie Swearingen.
Below are excerpts of a speech
Father Jozo gave to the pilgrims visiting Medjugorje on October 4,
1998, the day after the Feast of St. Francis of Assisi. In the interest
of keeping the flavor and the intent intact, there has been no editing
of the vocabulary or syntax changed as Father Jozo's comments were
translated into English as he spoke.
I am
overjoyed that I am able to greet you and I thank you for having
responded to the call. The call of Our Lady, the Queen of Peace. .
Thankful that it was not too far for you to come. Thank you for not
being afraid that your plane would not crash into the ocean.
Yesterday was the feast day of a great man.. You see how he stands in our midst. Our brother, our interceptor, St. Francis.
He, after inspiring us for 8 centuries.. inspiring the young and the
old the sick and the healthy and when he felt that his generation was
destroying everything. When even in our generation we are destroying
our nature, it has come to mind to consecrate and dedicate everything
to him. And this our hope. A desire to have a great dialog amongst
religions and his, too.
The
Holy Father came to the tomb of this great man, this little brother
Francis, to start this great dialog amongst religions. And it is a
great state, a monumental state when all people from various religions,
various parts of the world came and prayed at his tomb together. He is
the man who left behind his sword and his sheath and he took the crop.
Here is a man who left his precious horse and replaced him with bare
feet and sandals. Here is the man who exchanged his very precious
garments all decorated with real gold and even fur and instead has
taken on poverty. This is what we dont know how to do. This is what I
can not do and I dont know how to do. And this man that stands before
me in inspirations saying to me: "You also can."
And I'm deeply convinced that I can. And each time I think of him..
when I look at him, when I meet him in my heart, he tells me:
"Do not be afraid, you can do likewise."
I'm so glad
that you came on this precious saint's feast day. After today, I am
certain you will love him more, you will respect him more. St. Francis
as a young man was always in tears. A man filled with the greatest joy,
always wiping away tears. And his brothers asked him.. why are you
crying? Why are you always crying? You look at the cross and you cry.
You teach an assignment and you cry. You see the sign as you cross the
road and you cry and you wipe away your tears. Why are you crying?
And St.
Francis responded and said: "Because I don't love. I don't know how to
love. It is my desire that I learn how to love. And then he turned to
his brothers and said: "My brothers look.. as he pointed to Jesus
saying .. Love is not love. I desire to learn how to love."
Eight
centuries later in Medjugorje, Our Lady speaks to us and says: "Dear
children. How is it that you dont know how to love Jesus? How is it
that you dont know how to love his cross and his wounds? Look at his
wounds. Looks at the cross and learn how to love." And what we do we
learn when we look at the cross. We learn so much. We learn most that
we can learn.. we gain the greatest lessons of love. Before the cross
we learn how to love. And love means to give our life for others. I
live live for others. Yes, I can learn to live for others. And it is a
continual event to do more. To be more an image of Jesus. In the last
message Our Lady says to us: "Dear children. I desire to call you to
live the faith of your fathers. To return to the faith of your
fathers."
Yesterday
you were in Split. Why? That you may learn together with the Holy
Father the faith of a nation.. of the church. In that city where many
of you were yesterday with the Holy Father, the oldest known cathedral
today is there. An older cathedral does not exist. The persecutor of
the church 1100 years ago made himself a most beautiful tomb, like a
Roman Emperor on the site. And he wanted to die in the most beautiful
city of his kingdom. And then thats why he has placed his castle on the
edge of the ocean. He built on the land his tomb. But he was talked
into murdering the bishop who was found in the vicinity of that
village. There, where the Holy Father was with the young yesterday
afternoon. And he was the one who was talked into persecuting the
followers of Christ. And the Roman Emperor became an executor and a
murder. And he died. And it is in his tomb that the Christians brought
their martyr, their saint, their bishop. In the mean time freedom came.
And the successor of the Emperor said: "No Christians are allowed to be
persecuted by decree." And in the mausoleum that the king had built for
himself, the Christians placed their bishop. And to the living bishop
at the time they built everything next to their cathedral. And thats
why Our father came to celebrate the great strength of faith of
martyrdom in this city. But, the city does celebrate 1700 years of its
diocese of its city . That is the faith of your father who was prepared
to die for Jesus.
Today, you
are in relatively desolate area. For us, who are born here, it is
beautiful. For example we have other Brother Eustive here.. and he's
been a priest for 33 years and he lives in the diocese in the US. And
although he no longer lives here, he's always happy to return here.
Because it the love of this beautiful place always remains. And for
those that loves this place, it is never desolate, it is never a desert
but, it is always home.
And for you
it will become that place. And do you know why? Because this place was
consecrated to Our Lady. 150 years ago it was consecrated to her. The
church was built at that time. 50 years ago when the
communists came, when the church was celebrating its 100th anniversary
of the monastery. It was the communists that came and said there was no
more God. And when they came they found 30 Franciscans. 30 professors
of the adjacent seminary. And they told them there was no more God.
That their church was dead. And there was no more church and no more
pope and that there was no more need for that. They told them that
their life was superficial. They told the Franciscans to remove their
habits. To leave their faith and go into the world.
But,
they could not. and they said: "No, we can not leave." When the enemy
recognized that the Franciscans were so full of faith and conviction,
an enraged soldier took the crucifix from the wall and threw it at the
feet of the Franciscans. Present were the children who were in the
school of students they were teaching. And it was before those
children, the communists said to the Franciscans: "Now you may choose.
Life or Death." Each one of them chose Jesus. So warmly they embraced
Him! They kissed Him. And the confessed the great one thing. And they
said: "You are my Father and my everything. You are everything and I am
nothing." One by one they were taken outside and thrown into the
flames. But, some they went knowing full well where they were going.
They went with blessings. And the enemies that are alive today,
witnesses say.. "As we were persecuting them, they were praying for us.
As we cursed them, they rejoiced and celebrated God and they sang."
What a great step that was. Being thrown into flames. This is the faith
of the your Fathers. This is the faith of your fathers.
In the last
message Our Lady says to return the faith of our fathers. This is the
time to live according to the faith of our fathers. Yes, you are on a
journey. And we must be careful that the same might not happen to your
faith that happened to technology. What happened? The plows that were
pulled by the horses are replaced by the great and powerful tractors in
the fields. The slow ships are being replaced by power ships. And the
trip from America that would have taken you months to travel the ocean
now only takes 12 hours. Before to hear news from another continent
took a long time. But, now simultaneously we are able to see the
transmissions from around the world.
Ontroerend nietwaar maar sinds enige tijd zijn we wat
voorzichtiger geworden met Franciskanen uit de Balkan en onze ijverige
lezertjes die onze bijdragen over Pius XII hebben gelezen zullen ons
dat niet kwalijk nemen, vermoeden we...
Liefhebbertjes van zulke suikerzoete verhaaltjes zoals hierboven kunnen verder hun hartjes ophalen op deze site:
Maar
wat ontdekken we al vlug als we ons op het goede pad willen begeven?
Deze heilige man heeft een sabbatjaartje genomen en heeft zich wat
teruggetrokken om nog heiligere werken te doen...
Father Jozo Zovko on Sabbatical. Here
is the official letter circulated on Fathers behalf by his assistant,
Mrs. Vesna Curic:Siroki Brijeg, February 9, 2009 With this notice we
desire to inform you that due to health reasons, the need for rest and
recuperation, and due to the commencement of construction on Badija, Fr
Jozo Zovko has asked his superiors for permission to reside outside of
the Province. The Province Board approved this request. For this
reason, we are canceling all programs planned for the ensuing year. We
kindly ask all our co-ordinators and co-workers, organizers of
pilgrimages to Medjugorje, organizers of prayer meetings and seminars,
and all Medjugorje Centers and pilgrims to respect this and not to plan
or ask for a meeting with Fr Jozo during this time. We thank you for
your understanding, and united in prayer we remain yours truly in
Christ.-Vesna Cuzic-on behalf of Fr JozoInternational God-Parenthood
for the Herceg-Bosnian Child.
The Lord
knows why He sometimes allows a gap or a painful absence to enter into
our lives He always has a plan. Remember when Abraham renounced his
son Isaac, only to bear even greater fruit for humanity? When Saint
Joseph thought that he had to give up marrying Mary, it was to finally
find her in a more pure and beautiful way. But he had to go through an
agony so that his own heart would enlarge to match hers! If Fr.
Jozos absence is a painful pruning process for the pilgrims and for
each one of us here, it would be good nevertheless for all of us to
welcome the event with a positive attitude, not as a calamity, but
rather as a gift from God Who will use it for a greater purpose. Just
imagine, it is quite possible that this time of sabbatical may save Fr.
Jozos life, and prevent him from collapsing from exhaustion without
warning as Fr. Slavko did! Isnt it also possible that a change in his
life pattern may permit him to perceive other aspects of Marys plan
for Medjugorje that he may reveal to us later on? The possibilities for
why God chose this time to give Father Jozo a break are endless. One
thing we can be sure of is that if we welcome this time of trial with
faith and even with gratitude, we will free the way for the Lord to
harvest all its fruit, in our day and in Eternity. But if we mourn what
was ours before and now seems lost, or even worse, if we attempted to
blame someone for having robbed us of it, we certainly would be wasting
our time and ruining Gods plan. Im sure that Fr. Jozo is expecting
us to display an attitude of faith. Lets make this our way to thank
him for his 27 years of service to us! Let us also pray for him, and
continue to study his teachings that are still available on CDs, DVDs
and books at Siroki Brijeg. Dearest Gospa, we dearly love you! In the midst of all the tribulations of this life, you are our resplendent star! Sister Emmanuel +
Beste lezertjes, proef elk woord van deze wonderlijke tekst
want weldra zal een andere iets wereldsere versie op jullie gelovige
zieltjes worden losgelaten...maar eerst nog wat rozenwater sprenkelen
over deze brave ziel en merk vooral op dat er in de eerste tekst wordt gewezen op de
"beschermende" rol die onze Franciskanen hier ter plekke hebben
gespeeld....daar weten we alles over natuurlijk...en dan zeggen dat het
Franciskanerklooster van Siroki Brijeg één van de ergste monsters uit
WOII heeft voortgebracht ene zekere Peter Brzica en wie is deze beschermengel der bevolking?
The worst atrocities, strange as it may seem,
were carried out by members of the intelligentsia. The case of
Peter Brzica is undoubtedly one of the most incredible in this
category. Peter Brzica had attended the Franciscan College at
Siroki Brijeg, Herzegovina, was a law student, and a member of
the Catholic organization of the Crusaders (Krizari). In the
concentration camp at Jasenovac, on the night of August 29, 1942,
orders were issued for executions. Bets were made as to who could
liquidate the largest number of inmates. Peter Brzica cut the
throats of 1,360 prisoners with a specially sharp butcher's
knife. Having been proclaimed the prize-winner of the
competition, he was elected King of the Cut-throats. A gold
watch, a silver service, and a roasted sucking pig and wine were
his other rewards. A doctor, Dr. Nikola Kilolic, himself a Croat,
was an eyewitness in the camp when the event took place, and
subsequently testified to the authenticity of this astonishing
deed.[2]
Father Jozo Zovko, O.F.M., the priest most recognized with the apparitions
and spiritual phenomena of Medjugorje. His selection came
from the many readers who believe in the message of Medjugorje
which Father Jozo continues to emphasize today, the same message
imparted to saints for centuries including Saint John Bosco
through his vision of the two pillars - the Eucharist and
devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary's Immaculate Heart. He
has often been called the "Eucharistic priest."
While this term should apply to all priests because of the
immense privilege and right they are afforded through the
Sacrament of Holy Orders, Father Jozo is constantly upholding
the Eucharist as the answer to all our questions.
How fitting it was that he was called Jozo for in Croatian
it means Joseph and he was born on that great saint's feast
day - March 19, 1941 in the village of Uzari in the parish
of Siroki Brijeg, where he is assigned today at the Franciscan
monastery. He was the eighth of ten children born to Mate
and Milka Zovko and the times were tough for World War II
was in full force, but the family survived and little Jozo
finished his primary grade school first in Uzari, then Siroki
Brijeg before realizing he had a vocation to the priesthood.
He entered the seminary in Bol on the island of Brac directly
south of Split in the Adriatic Sea. He transfered to the major
seminary in Sarajevo after Novitiate and at the age of 26
was enrolled at Ljubljana University receiving his degree
in Theology. He was ordained in Sarajevo on August 6, 1967.
He was assigned to the Gratz University in Austria to continue
studies.
Upon graduating in the early seventies he returned to his
homeland of Yugoslavia where communism ruled. Though the communist
regime allowed worship, they frowned on those who were too
faithful. One of those was Father Jozo. Because of his deep
faith, his devotion to God and because of his tremendous influence
in the parishes where he was assigned, the communists influenced
the local bishop to transfer him often. It must be understood
that the bishops were selected at that time and all the way
up until after the fall of the communistic regime in the early
nineties, by approval of the communist authorities in Belgrade.
This included Bishop Zanic and the present prelate Bishop
Peric. It was often a tough call for the Vatican but the Holy
See realized it was the only way to prevent total persecution
of the Church. It's also interesting to note that the two
bishops in question who have ruled against Medjugorje, the
Vatican has taken jurisdiction on ruling on Medjugorje out
of their hands in unprecedented moves. That and the long history
of the Franciscans' loyalty to the people and the Church should
shed some light on the current flap between the bishops and
Franciscans regarding Medjugorje and which have been totally
blown out of proportion in accusing the Franciscans of being
disobedient. Nothing could be further from the truth and the
Franciscans continue to operate in Medjugorje at St. James
and surrounding areas of Bosnia within the Diocese of Mostar
because of Vatican intervention. The Holy See is well aware
of the politics and corruption of past bishoprics because
of communist influence.
It was into this atmosphere that Father Jozo was transferred
to St. James parish in Medjugorje, which, in Croatian means
"between two mountains." This agricultural valley
was a small village where the Faith was practiced but not
with the devotion expected. Father Jozo began to preach and
entreat the people to return to the Sacraments, to live their
Faith. He was like "John the Baptist" if you will
for, without him realizing it, he was preparing the parish
for what was to come eight months after he had been assigned
to St. James as the new pastor. On June 24, 1981, while he
was on retreat in Croatia, the Blessed Mother is reported
to have appeared on the Podrbo, also called "Apparition
Hill." Medjugorje would never be the same, nor would
Father Jozo.
When he first was told of the apparitions, he felt the children
- Mirjana Dragicevic, Ivanka Ivankovic, Maria Pavlovic, Ivan
Dragicevic, Vicka Ivankovic and Jakov Colo - were all pulling
a prank. He chastised them for such tales and the seriousness
of such claims. To his surprise, rather than the children
coming clean and admitting it was a hoax, they stuck to their
story insisting the "Gospa" had appeared to them.
Still he didn't believe until he knelt in St. James alone
one morning after Mass and heard a Heavenly voice say, "Protect
the children." Almost immediately they came flying into
the rectory, out of breath with the communist soldiers in
pursuit. He knew instantly it was no hoax and sought to give
the six young ones sanctuary. For this he paid the price.
He was summoned to communist headquarters in Mostar where
he was accused of provoking an uprising by spurring the children
to fabricate the apparitions and get the parishioners stirred
up against the communists. They ordered him to suppress the
movement in Medjugorje as more and more were flocking to this
village as news spread. Had they called him in one week earlier,
before he heard the voice which he knew instinctively was
from God, he might have complied. But he could not go against
God's charge. Therefore he refused and, after a kangaroo court,
was sentenced to three years of prison. The sentence in communistic
incarceration was commuted to half that following the pressure
applied on the Yugoslav government by the faithful in Medjugorje
and surrounding areas as well as others outside the country
who had heard of the phenomena and the travesties against
him.
In the spring of 1983, Father Jozo was released and transferred
to St. Elijah in Tihaljina. It was here where we first came
in contact with this holy priest. It was May of 1990 during
our first pilgrimage to Medjugorje, one that would forever
change our life. We were kneeling at the communion rail after
his inspiring two hour talk in which he blessed each person
afterwards. It was a throwback to the old way of receiving
Our Lord at Holy Communion, except this time it was the Holy
Spirit Who came through the charisma of Father Jozo; for as
we knelt immediately in front of that beautiful, famous statue
of Our Lady, known as "Our Lady of Tihaljina" we
could feel the power of the Advocate. As he placed his hands
on our head, a warmth never before felt came over us and were
slain in the Spirit for the first time ever in the most relaxing,
peacefilled mode ever experienced.
This charism has been experienced by millions who have flocked
to Medjugorje and made side trips to Tihaljina and now the
monastery in Siroki Brijeg to hear and be touched by this
amazing priest. He continued to receive pilgrims, preaching
and touching them until 1992 when the war in Croatia and then
Bosnia-Herzegovina prevented this. He turned his attentions
to helping his people, making trips to London, Washington,
New York, Paris, Brussels, Strasbourg and Rome on a peace
mission trying to persuade political leaders to help stop
the killing and suffering of innocent people. It was the same
kind of mission Bishop Carlos Ximenes Belo just returned from
concerning his beleaguered and suffering flock in East Timor.
Just as he had been called by Heaven to "Protect the
children" when the six visionaries were threatened, so
also he has been called by God to protect the children ravaged
by war and hate. He helped establish the International Godparenthood
which served as a vehicle for people the world over to adopt
a Godchild from among the many whose parents were killed in
the devastating war that slaughtered 280,000 over a four-year
period and destroyed countless homes and churches throughout
Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. It was established on December
20, 1992 with Father Jozo as president of the association.
Today over 4,000 children are cared for spiritually and financially
in Siroki Brijeg through this organization. There is also
the Holy Family Institute which he is involved with which
sponsors a children's renewal center in Siroki Brijeg serving
as a clearing house for people of all faiths in rebuilding
and getting back on their feet after the devastation of war.
The center provides food, shelter, clothing and the opportunity
to educate all as to the sacredness of human dignity. The
center is, as Father Jozo explains, "a monument of love..the
monument that speaks to all generations here as to what love
has done by reestablishing themselves in society for the good."
While he has sponsored and approved of many organizations,
he has also been used by some. One such was the "Nine
Novenas of Prayer" in which the organizers illegally
signed his name to it. He took umbrage for much of the appeal
dealt with a forboding apocalyptic tone full of fear and fatalistic
threats. Father Jozo renounced that as he wrote, "In
through these fatalistic and threatening texts are obviously
contrary to the messages of the Queen of Peace who for eighteen
years as a mother has been arousing, instructing and inspiring
millions of pilgrims and followers toward an apostolate of
prayer and fasting."
Another project that did not have his blessings and which
he was not consulted on was the movie "Gospa", a
poorly done portrayal of him played by Martin Sheen in which
the facts were misrepresented and he was made to look like
a priest more interested in his image than souls. Nothing
could be further from the truth for he is a man who speaks
from the heart - a heart that reveals a selflessness and total
surrender to God's Will. Even though "Gospa" was
promoted to aid the refugees, it died a quick death because
it was not faithful to the life of Father Jozo and his own
sister Sister Fabiana, a humble, obedient nun who in no way
represents the Hollywood image conveyed by Morgan Fairchild
in the part of Sister Fabiana. In an interview in 1995, Father
Jozo refuted most of what was in the movie.
Since 1992 he has been stationed at the Franciscan monastery
in Siroki Brijeg just a short way from where he was born.
But he has also traveled the world, from the far east, the
mid east, Americas and throughout Europe and Africa spreading
the message of Medjugorje and the vital importance of the
Eucharist which are intrinsically linked as Father says, "Place
your life upon the altar. You will witness how a priest will
place a drop of water within a chalice full of wine. That
drop of water intermingles with the wine and signifies you
in the Holy Mass. You can become one, unite with and intermingle
with Jesus. That is why the Holy Mass is called Communion
- union with God - you and your God together - that is the
Holy Eucharist." He also pointed out this link before
Mass in Portland, Oregon a few years ago which we have taken
from www.medjugorje.org, "Why is it that churches and
sects do not tolerate the Mass, do not respect Our Lady? Because
they go hand-in-hand. Yes, they go together. Our Lady teaches
to come to love Jesus, to fall in love with Him, and that
is why she places us before the Holy Eucharist, and pleads
with us to pray before this holy, Blessed Sacrament, so from
Jesus we may learn to become bread for others; so that I not
have fear to say, 'Take this, all of you, of Me, and eat of
it.'...Our Lady works in miraculous ways. She was always the
sign, the sign of a better world, the sign of peace and unit
in the Church, the sign of our salvation."
Father Jozo has been persecuted, imprisoned, denigrated
and accused of unspeakable sins from graft to child abuse.
What is his defense against all of this? "Father, forgive
them. They know not what they do." He can be found innumerable
hours a day before the Tabernacle in prayer, pleading not
for his own will and reputation but for God's Will to be done
no matter the consequences. He epitomizes the priests of Medjugorje
who day-in-day-out are ridiculed and placed under the magnifying
glass of scrutiny - men like Father Svetozar Kraljivec, OFM,
another very humble and holy priest whose heroic acts during
the war have gone untold at his request; Father Ivan Landeka,
OFM, the current pastor of St. James, Father Slavko Barbaric,
OFM, who was the voter's choice for the 41st selection of
the TOP 100 CATHOLICS OF THE CENTURY on October 14th; Father
Petar Ljubicic, OFM, the priest whom visionary Mirjana Dragicevic
has selected to receive and announce the ten secrets when
Our Lady says to do so; Father Philip Pavic, OFM, the American-born
Franciscan who serves the English-speaking pilgrims in Medjugorje
and has come to be known as the loveable ol' curmudgeon with
a cynical streak; Father Tomislav Vlasic, OFM, Father Ivan
Dugandzic, OFM;Father Tomislav Pervan, OFM, now the Franciscan
provincial, and Father Ljudevit Rupcic, OFM who we personally
interviewed extensively along with Archbishop Frane Franic,
the former Archbishop of Split who was instrumental in the
Vatican taking the matter out of the local ordinary of Mostar's
hands.
Today, at 58 Father Jozo continues to minister to the people
of Siroki Brijeg and the countless pilgrims who come to hear
and be inspired. He also continues to travel the globe bringing
Our Lady's message to all. When asked about the criticism
that Medjugorje has become a commercial venture, he winces
but admits, "Our Lady is so pure that I would like the
entrance to her shrine to be clean, with no shops at all.
But I also understand that the people want to take something
home, to remember their visit. This is something that happens
in all famous places." He is truly correct in this which
can be corroborated if one ever visited Guadalupe, Lourdes
or Fatima. They all have vendors coming out of the woodwork,
as does the Vatican.
When asked about the fact the apparitions continue to this
day after an unprecedented eighteen and a half years, he doesn't
hesitate in affirming that "A made-up story could not
last this long. And it couldn't be satan's work. Satan doesn't
call for prayer and conversion." And this is what Father
Jozo continues to preach with every waking breath - prayer
and conversion! In this humble, charismatic Franciscan is
embodied the messages of Medjugorje.
en morgen gaan we verder uitspitten wat er nu allemaal gebeurt aan wonderen op deze "heilige plaats"
Letter of Ambassador Milo Pojar, Chairman of Organizing Committee, from February 9, 2009:
"More than six decades after World War II the terrible ghosts of the
Holocaust have not disappeared. The perverse ideology that led to the
horrors of the Holocaust still exists and throughout our continents
racial hatred and ethnic intolerance stalk our societies. Therefore, it
is our moral and political responsibility to support Holocaust
remembrance and education in national, as well as international,
frameworks and to fight against all forms of intolerance and hatred.
To assess the progress made since the 1998 Washington
Conference on Holocaust Era Assets in the areas of the recovery of
looted art and objects of cultural, historical and religious value
(according to the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art and the Vilnius Forum Declaration 2000), and in the areas of property restitution and financial compensation schemes.
To
review current practices regarding provenance research and restitution
and, where needed, define new effective instruments to improve these
efforts.
To review the impact of the Stockholm Declaration of 2000 on education, remembrance and research about the Holocaust.
To
discuss new, innovative approaches in education, social programs and
cultural initiatives related to the Holocaust and other National
Socialist wrongs and to advance religious and ethnic tolerance in our
societies and the world.
We sincerely hope this conference will mitigate the injustices
caused by the Holocaust and other National Socialist wrongs and prevent
them from recurring.
We look forward to welcoming you at the Prague Conference in June.
Ambassador Milo Pojar,
Chairman of the Organizing Committee, Prague"
Stuart E. Eizenstat will head the US delegation at the Holocaust Era
Former
Deputy Treasury Secretary and Under Secretary of State Stuart E.
Eizenstat will be the Head of US delegation on the Holocaust Era Assets
Conference. Stuart Eizenstat was President Jimmy Carter's Chief
Domestic Policy Adviser, and Executive Director of the White House
Domestic Policy Staff. He was President Bill Clinton's Deputy Secretary
of the Treasury (1999-2001), Under Secretary of State for Economic,
Business, and Agricultural Affairs (1997-1999). He also has served as
the U.S. ambassador to the European Union from 1993 to 1996 and as
co-chairman of the European-American Business Council (EABC). In 2008,
the Ambassador Stuart E. Eizenstat received Professorship in Jewish
history and culture at the University of Carolina
Op
deze site vinden jullie de uiterst interessante verklaring van
Theresiënstad die werd ondertekend door 46 landen en waarbij Servië en
het Vaticaan als waarnemers waren betrokken.
We
raden onze lezertjes aan om de verklaring van de Kroatië aandachtig te
lezen want blijkbaar is er wel wat veranderd maar we vinden het toch
maar zeer eigenaardig dat er wel zijdelings melding wordt gemaakt van
andere slachtoffers van de Holocaust dan de Joodse slachtoffers. Het
blijft voor de Kroaten toch moeilijk te erkennen dat Roma en Orthodoxen
ook werden uitgemoord. Maar het is zeker een begin en de verwijzing
naar Jasenovac en de andere religies en volkeren laten het beste
verhopen...
Maar ondanks het feit dat het Vaticaan als waarnemer
aanwezig was op deze conferentie wijst niets erop dat de Vaticaanse
archieven over de banden met de ustacha worden opengesteld voor
wetenschappers. Hier blijft de huidige paus dus doofstom maar hij gaat
wel vrolijk door met zaligverklaringen van dubieuse figuren als
Stepinac en Pius XII. Kan iemand ons hierover een deftige uitleg
geven? Waarschijnlijk niet. In elk geval is de morele authoriteit
waarop het vaticaan en de katholieke kerk zich zo graag beroept ver te
zoeken en kunnen we gerust spreken over puur cynisme...
Hieronder vinden jullie de volledige tekst van de Verklaring van Theresiënstad:
en
hieronder vinden jullie de aanklacht van een aantal slachtoffers van
het ustacharegime in een poging om hun gestolen goederen terug te
krijgen. Deze aanklacht voor een Amerikaanse rechtbank dateert van 2008
en geeft een zeer gedetailleerde beschrijving van de goederen met namen
en alle gruwelijke details. Opvallend is weer de rol van het Vaticaan
in het ganse verhaal en zeker van de Franciskanerorde. Na deze
aanklacht had het vaticaan haar volledige medewerking kunnen geven
maart het bleef ijzig stil ...en werd dus gevolgd door de eerste stap
naar de heiligverklaring van Pius XII.
Het zal zelfs voor de grootste bewonderaar van deze paus Pius XII wel
overduidelijk zijn dat zijn rol, zeker wat betreft de ustacha-affaire,
niet al te zuiver kan genoemd worden. Misschien was er geen
rechtstreekse persoonlijke betrokkenheid, alhoewel hij Ante Pavelic
persoonlijk een aantal keren heeft ontvangen terwijl hij zeker en vast
perfect op de hoogte moet zijn geweest wat er in nazi-Kroatië op dat
moment gaande was. Als hoofd van het Vaticaan en van de katholieke kerk
en dus ook van de Franciskanen kan je toch moeilijk zeggen dat hij niks
met deze gruwelen te maken had? Ons kan het geen reet schelen dat
een kerk heiligen benoemt. Dat zal wel deel uitmaken van de religieuse
folklore die wij absoluut niet willen aanvallen alhoewel jullie wel
zullen vermoeden dat ons geloof niet op de zelfde waarden berust, maar
erg geloofwaardig kan je dergelijke folklore dus niet noemen als je de
feiten onder ogen houdt. Meestal gaan de verdedigers van Pius XII met
een grote boog rond deze ustachaperiode en vallen ze enkel en alleen
terug op de Joodse Holocaust binnen de gekende Duitse uitroeiïngskampen
en komen ze aanzetten met het feit dat Pius XII inderdaad een vrij
groot aantal Joden heeft in bescherming genomen in Italië. Je kan er
echter niet omheen dat niet het zelfde is gebeurd binnen de nieuwe
nazivazalstaat Kroatië in WOII. Van ons mag die man zo heilig worden
als een Indische koe maar wij wilden alleen dat bepaalde feiten niet
zouden worden vergeten. Hopelijk zijn jullie het hiermee eens... En morgen krijgen jullie nog een mooi verhaal, als toetje, over dat bijzondere bedevaartsoord Medjugorje...
We pikken onze draad op die we voor het eindejaar even opzij hadden gelegd en gaan verder met onze reeks over Pius XII. Het is nu wel zo dat we Pius XII een sympathieke knul kunnen vinden omdat hij
blijkbaar niet zo nazigezind was als velen beweren. We gunnen hem het
voordeel van de twijfel wat betreft dat onderdeel tijdens WOII maar we
hebben wel zeer grote bedenkingen met de houding van het Vaticaan en
dus haar leider PIUS XII ten opzichte van de Croatische fascisten
namelijk de Ustascha's van Ante Pavelic en over het plundergoud dat
door deze monsters, want een ander woord zijn deze oorlogsmidadigers van
het ergste soort niet waard, werd gestolen bij de Joodse, Orthodoxe en
Romaminderheid van de fascistische vazalstaat.
We lezen in
officiële Amerikaanse rapporten dat daar nog steeds vragen worden
gesteld om achter de waarheid te komen en dat het Vaticaan daar
blijkbaar blijft over zwijgen. Van, een morele authoriteit als het
Vaticaan en de Katholieke kerk kan je beter verwachten denken wij:
hier
vinden we een vrij hallucinante kijk op de manier waarop
nazi-Duitsland aan buitenlandse valuta kwam om zijn
oorlogsinspanningen te financieren, evenals hoe en wie bepaalde
grondstoffen heeft geleverd aan de nazi-oorlogsmachine..Het zijn documenten die in 1998 door de Amerikaanse Eizenstatcommissie werden bovengespit...het leest als de betere spionageromans maar is helaas gebaseerd op ware feiten... http://financialservices.house.gov/banking/6498eiz.htm
we hebben de passage over de ustachi en het Vaticaan in vetjes gezet:
TESTIMONY FOR UNDER SECRETARY
OF STATE
STUART E. EIZENSTAT
HOUSE BANKING COMMITTEE
On the U.S. Government Supplementary Report on Nazi Assets
June 4, 1998
Mr. Chairman. I would like to thank the Committee for giving
me the opportunity to discuss with you a subject that has
captured the worlds attention due in some measure to the
pioneering work of this Committee.
I particularly want to single out the efforts and the
leadership of Chairman Leach and the Committee beginning with
your first hearing on this issue in 1996. You have been a leader
from the outset in raising the consciousness of America and the
world on Holocaust assets issues. You exhibited leadership in
convening a very useful hearing last June in the wake of our
preliminary report with historians from many of the affected
countries to comment on our findings. Your efforts continued with
last Februarys pathbreaking hearing in February which
focused on art and insurance. And todays hearing, with the
gathering of such distinguished panelists, is yet another example
of this Committees work to ensure that this complex and
emotional issue receives both the proper attention and
consideration by the U.S. Congress in an appropriately bipartisan
fashion.
This supplementary report that we released this week, like our
preliminary study completed in May 1997, reflects a solemn
commitment by the United States to confront the largely hidden
history of Holocaust-related assets after five decades of
neglect. I would like to acknowledge the tireless work and
dedication of the State Department Historian Dr. William Slany
and my Senior Advisor Bennett Freeman in preparing this report. I
would also like to acknowledge the work of the World Jewish
Congress, the World Jewish Restitution Organization, the American
Jewish Congress, the Jewish Agency, American Gathering of
Holocaust Survivors and Eli Rosenbaum and Dr. Barry White of the
Justice Department.
Our preliminary study was prepared by Dr. Slany in cooperation
with ten other agencies of the U.S. Government and released in
May 1997.
Our most significant findings were the overall movement of
looted gold flowing to and through Switzerland from Germany; the
fact that the Swiss National Bank must have known that some
portion of the gold it was receiving from the Reichsbank was
looted from occupied countries; and that the gold received by the
Swiss National Bank from the Reichsbank included some stolen from
Holocaust victims, although there is no evidence that the Swiss
National Bank knew this fact.
These findings were confirmed by the bold and probing gold
report that Switzerlands Bergier Commission presented
initially at the London Nazi Gold Conference in December 1997 and
now by its more conclusive report released on May 25, 1998.
SCOPE OF THIS STUDY
Before highlighting for you the major new substantive findings
of the report, let me first explain the relationship between the
new, supplementary report and the preliminary study we released
last May. This supplemental study is the substantively
appropriate follow-up to the first report. The preliminary report
focused on how Nazi Germany financed its war effort using looted
gold. Switzerland figured so prominently because our focus was on
looted gold and the key role it played in the German war effort.
This report focuses on the uses to which that looted gold was
put that is, the ability of the Nazis to use the Swiss
francs they obtained in exchange for the gold they looted to
purchase, in turn, critical war supplies from the other neutral
countries necessary to sustain the war effort. In this way, by
illuminating the trade as well as the financing side of the
equation, our two reports together provide a comprehensive view
of the important part the wartime neutrals cumulatively played in
the structure of the German war economy.
Further research has allowed us to provide a more detailed
analysis of the economic roles played by other wartime neutrals
Argentina, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Turkey and
the factors that shaped those roles. We have focused on these
countries trading links with both the Axis and the Allies,
as well as on their handling of looted
assetsespecially gold. Let me begin by highlighting
our findings in this respect.
NEUTRALS SUPPLYING GERMAN WAR EFFORT
This report makes clear that whatever their motivations, and
however acceptable by the standards of the time for neutrals, the
cumulative trade of the World War II European neutral countries
helped to sustain the Nazi war effort by supplying key materials
to Germany essential to their conduct of the War -- in many cases
well past the point where, from the Allied perspective at the
time, there was a genuine threat of German attack.
As you can see from Chart 1 (Appendix) on the Neutral
Countries Supply of Germanys Major Resources,
Portugal and Spain together provided Germany with almost 100
percent of Germanys wartime supply of vitally-needed
wolfram, the essential mineral in processing tungsten for steel
alloys used in machine tools and armaments, especially
armor-piercing shells. The strategic significance of wolfram was
not lost on the Portuguese. Prime Minister Salazar himself
acknowledged in early 1944 that denying wolfram to Germany
"would reduce her power of endurance, and the war would be
accordingly shortened."
Sweden provided Germanys wartime industry with a major
portion -- as Chart 1 shows, in some war years up to
90-100 percent -- of its requisite iron ore (including a high
proportion of the high-grade ore needed for the production of the
specially hardened steel used in German weapons and armored
vehicles) and ball-bearings.
Turkey conducted a robust commerce (in chart 1) with both
sides that raised its gold reserves from 27 tons to 216 by the
end of 1945. In 1943, for example, Turkey provided essentially
100 percent of German requirements. Chart 1 shows that in 1943
Turkeys exports supplied Germany with up to 100 percent of
its annual requirements. According to Hitlers Armaments
Minister Albert Speer, the German war machine would have ground
to a halt without chromite ore. Indeed, Speer wrote in his
memoirs that he told Hitler in November 1943: "Should
supplies from Turkey be cut off, the stockpile of chromium is
sufficient for only 5-6 months. The manufacture of planes, tanks,
motor vehicles, tank shells, U-boats, almost the entire gamut of
artillery would have to cease from one to three months after this
deadline, since by then the reserves in the distribution channels
would be used up."
Implicitly or explicitly, the neutrals resisted Allied
economic diplomacy and expressed fear of German reprisal if their
economic relations were curtailed. This invocation of force
majeure by the neutrals could not be easily countered by the
Allies in the early years of the War when their vulnerability was
all too apparent. But the invincibility of the German war machine
was belied during 1943 with a series of major defeats that
foreshadowed the Allied victory. The neutral nations recognized
the turn of the tide and the receding danger of German attack or
reprisal, and began, at Allied demand, to curtail trade and other
measures that supported the German war effort. By late 1943, the
Allies were less willing to accept neutral claims of the threat
of force majeure as a reason to justify their continuing
economic interaction with the Nazi regime.
Chart 2 (appendix), which presents a Timeline of Trade,
Belligerency and Postwar Gold and Asset Negotiations and
Agreements between the Allies and the neutrals, summarizes the
key information in our report about the international legal and
economic relationships of the neutrals.
The first three columns summarize these major exports of the
neutrals to Germany, the other contributions of the neutrals to
the German war effort, and, in this third column, those major
contributions of the neutrals to the allied war effort.
The next three columns in the timeline show, based on the
information presented in the report, how the allies perceived the
diminution of German military threat to the neutrals in the
course of the war, how [in this next column] this is related to
the significant concessions the neutrals eventually made to the
allies, and [in the adjoining column] when the neutrals in fact
finally ceased their exports to Germany. Another column indicates
that two of the neutrals, Argentina and turkey, actually declared
war on Germany in the closing months of the war.
The final four columns show the dates when the various
neutrals began the gold restitution and assets negotiations with
the allies, when they were completed, and when gold and assets
were actually delivered to the allies. The details of the results
of these negotiations are presented in this chart.
COMPLEXITY OF NEUTRALITY
The report also sheds light on the complexities of
"neutrality" the different forms that neutrality
took in different countries for different reasons in ways
that should dispel any monolithic concept of neutrality during
World War II. The wartime neutrals often faced similar pressures
and counter-pressures but reacted to them in varied ways,
reflecting their specific wartime circumstances, the attitudes of
their leaders, and the more enduring features of their own
economies and geography.
There was no such thing as a uniform or absolute neutrality
during World War II. The ideological leaning of Francos
regime in Spain was clear and unmistakable; Francos
dispatch of the Blue Division to join the Wehrmacht at the
Russian front underscores this pro-Axis tilt. So, too, leading
members of the Argentine military regimes were also openly
sympathetic to the Axis. Swedens permission for German
troops to regularly transit its territory and to protect German
shipping in the Baltic were hardly "neutral" acts;
neither was Portugals granting access to the British to
bases in the Azores, even though it was a welcome and important
contribution to the Allied war effort.
Different factors shaped the "neutrality" of
Argentina, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and Turkey,
ranging from long-standing policies of avoiding entanglements in
European wars to the fear of invasion and the desire to reap
economic rewards. These interests, in turn, produced decisions
and actions which were at various times both consistent and
inconsistent with their claims of neutrality. These inconsistent
decisions and actions were at times helpful to Nazi Germany and
at other times helpful to the Allies. They were often based on
their own strictly legal interpretations of what was permissible
under existing international law, as distinct from moral
considerations of what was right or wrong. All these seemingly
inconsistent decisions and actions co-existed and contributed to
the complex phenomenon of neutrality during World War
IIa war which was in many ways different from
previous wars because of the unprecedented scope of the assault
on human values and the horrors of the Holocaust.
There are a number of questions that should be addressed today
by all the nations involved in World War II, including the
wartime neutrals, questions which can help them come to terms
with their role in the War. For example, at what point during
World War II did it become evident that Nazi aggression was not
just another in an endless series of European wars, but was
qualitatively different in its brutal treatment of civilians and
its threat to basic human values? At what point did the threat of
a Nazi invasion recede sufficiently so that with little risk,
trade with Germany in critical commodities could have been
sharply curtailed or stopped? If neutrality was defended during
the War as a way of self-defense, why was there so little
cooperation with the Allies after the War in returning looted
Nazi assets which had come into the possession of the wartime
neutrals or in liquidating German assets for the benefit of
stateless refugees and the reconstruction of war-torn Europe?
These are difficult questions to which there are no easy or
certain answers, with or without the benefit of hindsight.
There appears to have been a clear preponderance of sympathy
for the Allied cause in several of these countries, and
significant elements of sympathy in the others.
Consistent with this mixed pattern of actions was the refuge
offered by the neutral nations to more than 250,000 Jews fleeing
the Holocaust. Acts of humanity and even heroism rose above the
harshness or insensitivity of wartime refugee policies and
reflected well on their governments and peoples:
An estimated 100,000 refugees, mostly Jews, fled through
or into the Iberian peninsula. Spain allowed 20,000 to
30,000 refugees to cross the French border from the fall
of France until the summer of 1942, and another 7,500
refugees entered Spain by the end of 1944. The Portuguese
Government allowed Jewish organizations to relocate from
occupied Europe to Lisbon during the War. During 1941 and
1942 the Portuguese Government allowed 5,000 refugees to
pass through Portugal to the United States.
The Swedish Government provided refuge for about 7,000
Danish Jews who fled to the safety of Swedish shores.
Swedens protection, spearheaded by the personal
heroism of Raoul Wallenberg, was extended to 20,000 to
30,000 Jews who faced extermination in the last phase of
the Holocaust.
Turkey, which had protected Jews since their expulsion
from Spain in 1492, had, it is estimated, more than
100,000 Jewish refugees pass through its borders during
the War.
Argentina received a large number of Jewish refugees
between 1933 and 1945. Many of these 25,000 to 45,000
refugees reached Argentina before and during the War,
more than any other country in the Western Hemisphere
(including the United States).
Switzerland admitted over 50,000 Jewish refugees from
1933 until the end of the War, of whom some 30,000
remained and survived in Switzerland during the War.
NAZI GOLD
Now let me address the new findings in this report that bear
on the issue of Nazi Gold as distinct from the broader role of
the wartime neutrals that I have just highlighted.
We have arrived at new figures of looted gold. Our first
report estimated that Switzerland received as much as $414
million in total (looted and non-looted) gold from Nazi Germany.
These estimates were confirmed by the recently released Bergier
Report which estimated that some $440 million in total gold went
through Switzerland. These figures, taken together, now give us a
higher, more definitive range on total gold that flowed through
Switzerland.
One other new finding is presented as a separate annex
prepared by the U.S. Justice Departments Office of Special
Investigations. New sources have come to light that provide
additional information about the Melmer account at the
Reichsbank, in which the SS deposited the gold and other
valuables that it looted from individual citizens and from its
victims at killing centers and concentration camps. These sources
provide the most detailed data currently available for the value
of the gold in the Melmer account and yield an estimate for the
total value of this gold ($4.6 million in wartime value, $40.5
million in todays gold values) that is markedly higher than
previous estimates -- indeed, two times the Melmer estimates in
the Bergier Report.
These new, more definitive figures are based in part on our
assessment of the records of the DeGussa company and Reischbank
microfilm found in Vienna. Of particular importance is the
analysis of the postwar study by Albert Thoms, the head of the
Reischbanks Precious Metals Department, that details the
Melmer Shipment of SS loot to the Reischbank. The Thoms
study lists in gruesome detail in 29 columns the loot of victims
under such headings as Gold Bars, gold and silver coins, (Purses,
knives and forks, jewels, gold and diamond rings, watches, Dental
Gold, broken gold, etc.).
If the analysis of the Thoms Report is correct, the total
value that the Reischbank credited to the SS for the gold in its
loot shipments was between $3.9 million and $5.4 million. The
Justice Department historians make the conservative estimate for
the gold in the loot shipment at $4.65 million. And this does not
include the estimated $3.9 million in gold bullion and coins
forwarded to the Reischbank as a result of Operation Reinhard,
the Nazi program to exploit Jewish property and labor and murder
millions of Jews in killing centers in eastern Poland.
This supplemental study further reveals that victim gold from
the Melmer account was also included in gold that the Dresdner
Bank and the Deutsche Bank - both German commercial banks
-- sold on the Turkish free market as part of a scheme to supply
the Reichsbank with foreign currency, and to help Axis diplomats
and agents finance their operations in Turkey. Some of the nearly
$1 million in victim gold from the Melmer account obtained by
Dresdner Bank and Deutsche Bank likely was part of the gold sold
by those banks on the Turkish free market.
Nazi Germany financed a substantial portion of its war effort
by paying for its wartime imports from the neutral nations in
gold, much of it looted from occupied Europe and some of it
stolen from the millions of victims of the Holocaust. Most of
this looted gold was sent to the Swiss National Bank, which
converted it into Swiss francs or deposited it in the accounts of
other central banks.
In this trade, more than $300 million ($2.6 billion in
todays values) in Nazi gold reached Portugal, Spain,
Sweden, and Turkey during the War. We arrived at this figure by
adding up all the allied estimates of the gold the individual
neutral countries received from Germany. Chart 3 (Appendix) on
Allied assets and gold presents these estimates. Three-quarters
of this amount was transferred from Germany through the Swiss
National Bank, the principal gold trading center on the
continent.
This flow of gold from Germany to the neutrals persisted
through the War despite Allied warnings in January 1943 and
February 1944 against accepting transfers of assets from Nazi
Germany that had been looted from occupied countries. The
European neutral countries continued to accept looted gold from
the Reichsbank even after 1942 when it became clear that the
Reichsbank had long since exhausted its own prewar gold reserve
and was using the reserves of the looted central banks of the
countries overrun by Nazi forces.
The Allies estimated that Germany financed its imports from
Spain and Portugal with as much as $204 million in looted gold;
more than $20 million in gold financed German trade with Sweden.
Almost all of the gold that reached Turkey was traded through the
free commercial market, not through the Turkish Government. Chart
3 also includes Allied estimates of looted gold that reached each
neutral country.
Postwar Negotiations
The next new set of findings I want to highlight is the
postwar negotiations that the United States, Britain, and France
conducted with the wartime neutrals were protracted and failed to
meet fully their original goals: restitution of the looted gold
and the liquidation of German external assets to fund the
reconstruction of postwar occupied Europe and to provide relief
for Jewish and other non-repatriable refugees. This resulted from
the intransigence of the neutrals after the War, conflicts within
Allied ranks and between the State and Treasury Departments, as
well as from competing priorities stemming from the onset of the
Cold War. Less than $20 million ($14.9 million from Sweden alone)
of the up to $240 million in looted gold acquired by the wartime
neutrals, apart from Switzerland, was returned to the Tripartite
Gold Commission to meet the claims from the central banks of 15
countries.
Chart 3 also summarizes the terms of the various accords that
the allies and the neutral countries reached after the war
regarding the restitution of gold and the liquidation of German
external assets.
Ustasha Gold
Finally, the report deals with the question of Ustasha Gold.
We became aware that the U.S. Government possessed important
documents bearing on Ustasha gold in particular. The chapter
raises questions about aspects of the Vaticans record
during and immediately after the War, to which answers may only
exist in Vatican archives.
The Ustasha regime in Nazi Germanys wartime puppet state
of Croatia systematically and mercilessly robbed, murdered, or
deported its Serbian, Sinti-Romany, and Jewish populations. Gold
and other valuables of the victims became a part of the Ustasha
treasury, which may have been as much as $80 million. Portions of
this treasury appear to have been transferred to Switzerland in
the last year of the War. Very little of it was accounted for in
the postwar arrangements made by Yugoslavia with the Allies and
Switzerland.
With the defeat in May 1945 of Hitler and his satellites,
including puppet Croatia, the leaders of the Ustasha regime fled
to Italy, where they found sanctuary at the pontifical College of
San Girolamo in Rome. This College was most likely funded at
least in part by the remnants of the Ustasha treasury, and may
have operated with at least the tacit acquiescence of some
Vatican officials. It helped fugitive Croatian war criminals
escape to the Western Hemisphere in the early postwar years, and
cooperated with the "rat line" being used by the U.S.
Army Counter Intelligence Corps after the War to assist the
escape from Europe of anti-Communists including the Nazi war
criminal Klaus Barbie.
The record of the terrible legacy of the Ustasha assembled for
this study is very incomplete. A full accounting should be made
now to achieve a complete understanding of these issues. The
opening of relevant archives in Croatia, Serbia, and the Vatican
and cooperative international research will be essential in this
effort.
OTHER HISTORICAL RESEARCH EFFORTS
These conclusions are based largely on the limited perspective
of our almost exclusive reliance on U.S. documents (as well as
captured Nazi documents in possession of the U.S.) which our
interagency team has located, declassified, and evaluated. We
hope that each country with a stake in these issues will
intensify its efforts to examine its own record and confront its
own history on its own terms and in its own way. It is essential
that these studies move forward quickly so that a more
comprehensive historical record of the looting and ultimate
disposition of Holocaust-era assets can finally be completed.
I want to salute those countries who are already undertaking
such efforts not only Switzerland with its Bergier
Commission but also the commissions which have been
established, in Argentina, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and
Croatia - to address these issues which are the focus of our
report. It is our hope that our two studies combined with these
and other efforts underway in other countries will complete the
historical record on these complex and painful issues. We share a
common commitment -- not only to come to terms with the past, but
to galvanize the urgent quest for justice for Holocaust victims
and survivors.
U.S. HOLOCAUST ASSETS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
This second and final report that I will personally direct
will not end our search for truth and our quest for justice.
Under your leadership Chairman Leach, you have introduced and
been the principal sponsor in the House of Representatives HR
3662 that would establish a U.S. Holocaust Assets Historical
Commission the counterpart to the bill introduced in the
Senate by Senator DAmato. We urge this Committee and the
House to act as soon as possible on this legislation which has
the strong support of the President.
This legislation was introduced in Congress on April 1 to
create a Presidential Commission to examine the fate of Holocaust
assets in the United States. The bill was introduced with
bipartisan support and the strong backing of the Clinton
Administration. The substantive mandate of the Commission will
focus on two key areas: first, to conduct original research on
the collection and disposition of Holocaust-era assets that came
under the control of the U.S. Government after Hitler came to
power in 1933 (assets such as gold, gems, bank accounts,
financial instruments, and art works); and second, to review
research being conducted more broadly in the public and private
sectors. The Commission will be charged with issuing a final
report to the President summarizing its findings and making
recommendations no later than December 31, 1999. Establishing a
strong Commission that can meet its mandate by this deadline will
send a message that the United States Government is determined to
address the fate of Holocaust assets here at home.
WASHINGTON CONFERENCE ON HOLOCAUST-ERA ASSETS
Mr. Chairman, we will also maintain our historical research
efforts in other ways as well. In order to build on the landmark
London Nazi Gold Conference held last December, and continue the
international search for truth, the Department of State and the
U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum will co-host from November 30 to
December 3 the Washington Conference on Holocaust-Era Assets. The
objective will be to review our progress on the gold issue, to
renew the drive to open archives and to share research on other
assets, especially on artworks and insurance.
As at London, the Washington Conference will not be a forum
for governmental decision-making. But we plan to use the
conference and our preparations to work with a wide range of
governments and NGOs to help shape a non-binding
international consensus on principles and processes for
redressing injustices in these categories of assets. We hope that
this consensus can give new impetus to the encouraging
initiatives already underway in many countries and that this
intergovernmental forum can be a catalyst for many other related
efforts to address this great unfinished business of the
twentieth century.
Mr. Chairman, your personal leadership and the activity of
this Committee have played an important role in encouraging the
international community to make significant progress in exploring
issues of Holocaust-era assets. The hearing conducted in
February, which shed much light on the art and insurance issues,
was itself a landmark event in focusing long-overdue attention on
these areas. I personally appreciate your contribution, and as we
prepare for this important international conference, we want to
work very closely with you, this Committee, and your staff, as
well as with other interested Members of Congress.
Mr. Chairman, the examination of the complicated issues of
Holocaust-era assets is a difficult undertaking. While archival
research and international conferences have provided the
framework for achieving a greater understanding of the fate of
Holocaust assets, these issues have naturally had a vast public
political impact beyond the academic and diplomatic arenas. They
have come to command the attention of the world and touch the
conscience of humanity.
Mr. Chairman, you and the Committee are an essential part of
this historic effort. Thank you very much for your consideration.
I will be happy to take your questions
Dringende Oproep aan de Ollandse Kameraden Hangmatsocialisten,
Beste Kameraden,
Voor ons geen wereldrevolutie, geen revolutionair manifest, geen met bloed besmeurde vaan, geef ons zo een Unoxmuts!
WIJ WILLEN ONZE EIGEN UNOXMUTS!
Wie bezorgt er ons zulke kleinood dat wij hier met fierheid elke dag zullen dragen. Hier in Belgistan vinden we ze niet en net zoals de bananen ooit de Berlijnse muur hebben geslecht en gesloopt zal de Unoxmuts Brussel-Halle-Vilvoorde laten splitsen! Een Unoxmuts dat willen we!
en als heel speciale attentie voor onze talrijke Ollandse lezertjes beginnen we het nieuwe jaar
2010, na ons overzicht, met de Unoxnieuwjaarsduik die jullie allemaal
kunnen vinden op:
We zijn dus in goeden doen en ongehavend in 2010 terecht gekomen, beste
lezertjes, en we hopen van jullie het zelfde! Traditioneel worden
jaarovergangen gebruikt om wat terug te blikkken en zo beter vooruit te
kijken. meestal komt er van al de goede voornemens niet al te veel
terecht maar traditie is er om nageleefd te worden en dus publiceren we
wat cijfermateriaal over ons blogje. We kunnen nu immers al met enige
trots en een zekere ijdelheid naar een verleden kijken. We zijn geen
beginners meer en gelukkig nog geen vaste waarden. We doen nog steeds
voluit onze zin en dat blijkt gelezen te worden. Is het uit sympathie
en nieuwsgierigheid of uit zuivere antipathie met even veel
nieuwsgierigheid, het zal ons worst wezen en uit de reacties kunnen we
het niet afleiden want er zijn er zeer weinig. We zijn daar blij mee
want als we het niveau van de meeste reacties zien op de ons bekende
Vlaamse blogs of sites van Vlaamse kranten dan kunnen we slechts hopen
dat het soort primitievelingen dat dergelijke nonsens schrijft ons
bespaard blijft zoals het tot op vandaag is gelukt!
Welke
cijfertjes hebben wij nu behaald want we willen onze lezertjes toch
niet in het ongewisse laten en we zijn nu, op een paar dagen na, bijna
twee volledige jaargangen bezig:
In
totaal werden we vanuit 81 verschillende landen gelezen maar daarvan
zullen de meesten wellicht toevalstreffers zijn geweest. Wat ons heel
erg blij maakt is de erg mooie verdeling tussen Belgiê en Nederland
waarmee we waarschijnlijk de meest Groot-Nederlandse politieke blog
zijn op bloggen. En alhoewel we geen Groot-Nederlandse ideologie
aanhangen zijn we daar dus ontzettend gelukkig mee. Zeker omdat dit al
zo van bij het begin was en dat de percentuele verdeling bijna volledig
identiek is gebleven gedurende de voorbije twee jaar. Bedankt belgen en bedankt ollanders, ook bedankt yanks en fransen en duitsers en engelsen en dus ook enkele zweden! We hopen julloie nog lang te mogen bedanken en in elk geval allemaal een zeer leuk 2010 toegewenst!
Wij
zien het helemaal zitten om in 2010 verder te doen en misschien weer
enkele nieuwe dingen uit te proberen. Jongens en meisjes met suggesties
zijn welkom en medewerkertjes mogen zich aanmelden met hun eigen
voorstellen. Wij gooien in 2010 alle ramen en vensters open!
Waar
we ook zeer trots op zijn is het feit dat we gedurende het ofvergrote
deel van het jaar op nummer één stonden bij de politieke blogs van
bloggen:
We
staan ook al een paar maanden ergens tussen de viftigste en de
zeventigste plaats in de top 90 van Bloggen en dat als enige politieke
blog. Dat vinden we ook niet slecht, al zeggen we het zelf! Dit is de situatie vandaag :
Waarom houden jullie zich bezig met die oude Balkanvetes horen we nu
menig lezertje vragen. Wel doodeenvoudig omdat ze stilaan terug in de
actualiteit opduiken. Het Vaticaan tracht een aantal belangrijke
spelers zoals Pius XII heilig te verklaren, is er al in gelukt om de
dubieuse aartsbisschop Stepinac al tot de zaligen te laten behoren,
terwijl die figuur van ons best nog een deel eeuwigheid in het vagevuur
zou mogen doorbrengen. En er zijn zeer recent pogingen geweest om het
ustacha-goud dat werd geroofd uit de bank en gestolen van Serviërs en
Zigeuners door hen te laten betalen voor hun eigen leven in puur goud
en hen vervolgens toch nog beestachtig te vermoorden en zelfs nog hun
gouden tanden d'r uit te kloppen, te recupereren. We beginnen in 1998
en let vooral op het "ethisch bankieren" van het Vaticaan...en de rol
van vrome franciskanen uit de kliek van broeder Satan ...
Did gold stolen by Croatian fascists reach the
Vatican?
BY SUSAN HEADDEN, DANA HAWKINS,
AND JASON VEST
Through the nightmare of World War II that
would end with 56 members of her family perishing in
concentration camps, there were two days that Eta Najfeld will
never forget. The first was April 10, 1941, when Najfeld, a
25-year-old Jewish medical student, watched as exuberant crowds
lined the streets of Zagreb to cheer the Ustashasthe
ultranationalist fascist party that the Nazis had just installed
at the helm of an "independent" Croatian state. The
other was three months later, when a band of Ustasha soldiers
burst into her family's shop, an elegant emporium stocked with
Oriental rugs, English linens, and French silks. "They took
everything," says Najfeld, now 82 and living in Belgrade.
As the Nazis and their allies sent millions of
Jews and others to their deaths, they stole billions of
dollars from their victims. In the postwar chaos, and the horror
of their anguish, Najfeld and most other survivors cast from
their mind any thought of recovering the property they had lost.
Najfeld still worries that any talk about lost wealth will
somehow diminish the enormity of the Holocaust.
But in recent months, new evidence has forced
victims and accomplices alike to confront that nearly forgotten
question: What happened to the loot? The Nazi plunder has been
traced to banks in Switzerland, Sweden, Portugal, and other
neutral countries that were secretly helping the Nazis stash
stolen gold or launder it to buy war materiel. One state after
another has opened its archives and banking records to aid the
search, with one glaring exception: the Vatican.
The Vatican's continuing secrecy means the
evidence is incomplete, but already declassified documents from
the archives of the United States and other nations suggest
thatwith the aid of Croatian Catholic priestsUstasha
plunder made its way from Croatia to Rome, and possibly to the
Vatican itself. Some of the stolen wealth was used to help
Croatian war criminals flee to South America.
"We make no charges against the Vatican,
but we keep building a very damning picture," says Elan
Steinberg, executive director of the World Jewish Congress.
"Because of their silence in the face of accumulated
evidence, the failure to uncover the truth can only be laid at
the doors of the Vatican."
Next month, a task force headed by Under
Secretary of State Stuart Eizenstat that is investigating the
role of the neutral countries is expected to issue a report that
raises questions about the Vatican's wartime financial dealings.
Among the documents reviewed: a declassified 1944 intelligence
report noting a transfer of funds, via a Swiss bank, from
Berlin's Reichsbank to the Vatican. Although there may be
innocent explanations for such dealingschurch assets being
moved out of Germany, perhapsthe discovery of similar
transactions by Swiss banks led to revelations of a huge Nazi
operation to launder stolen gold with the help of neutral
countries.
Church blessing. The Croatian
connection, however, is the core of the new evidence that
suggests the Vatican might have directly handled funds stolen
from the victims of the Nazis and their allies. From 1941 to
1945, the Ustashas exterminated an estimated 500,000 Serbs, Jews,
and Romany (Gypsies) and looted their property. They demanded
ransom amounting to 1,00 kilograms of gold from all the Jews in
Zagreb, only to ship them to concentration camps and kill them
anyway. It is a matter of historical record that the Croatian
Catholic Church was closely entangled with the Ustashas. In the
early years of World War II, Catholic priests oversaw forced
conversions of Orthodox Serbs under the aegis of the Ustasha
state; Franciscan friars distributed Ustasha propaganda. Several
high Catholic officials in Yugoslavia were later indicted for war
crimes. They in eluded Father Dragutin Kamber, who ordered the
killing of nearly 300 Orthodox Serbs; Bishop Ivan Saric of
Sarajevo, known as the "hangman of the Serbs"; and
Bishop Gregory Rozman of Slovenia, a wanted Nazi collaborator. A
trial held by the Yugoslav War Crimes Commission in 1946 resulted
in the conviction of a half-dozen Ustasha priests, among them
former Franciscan Miroslav Filipovic-Majistorovic, a commandant
of the Jasenovac concentration camp where the Ustashas tortured
and slaughtered hundreds of thousands with a brutality that
shocked even the Nazis.
As more secret documents become public,
however, one priest emerges as the most significant player of
all. The Rev. Krunoslav Draganovic, a Franciscan, had been a
senior official of the Ustasha committee that handled the forced
conversion of Orthodox Serbs. In 1943, the Ustasha arranged with
the Croatian Catholic Church to send Father Draganovic to Rome.
There he served as secretary of the Istituto San Girolamo, a
seminary for Croatian monks that was in fact a center of
clandestine Ustasha activity. Draganovic also became Ustasha
leader Ante Pavelic's unofficial emissary to the Vatican, and de
facto liaison to the Pontifical Relief Commission, a Vatican
organization that aided refugees during and after the war.
The ratline. According to
secret reports from the U.S. Army's Counterintelligence Corps
(CIC), written just after World War II and since declassified,
Draganovic and his collaborators at San Girolamo provided money,
food, housing, and forged Red Cross passports for a number of
Ustasha war criminals seeking to escape justice. Through an
underground railroad of sympathetic priests, known as the
"ratline," the Ustashas could move from Trieste, to
Rome, to Genoa, and on to neutral countriesprimarily
Argentina where they could live out their days unpunished
and unnoticed. Along the ratline, virtually the entire Ustasha
leadership went free. "All these people were
escapingand this at a time when just getting a meal in Rome
was a major accomplishment," recalls William Gowen, a CIC
officer in Rome after the war.
The copies of memos filed by Gowen
and other members of the counterintelligence corps, now stored in
U.S. Army archives at Fort Belvoir, Va., contain a wealth of
detail on suspicious comings and goings at San Girolamo. The
dispatches leave little doubt that the ancient walled compound at
Via Tomacelli 132 was more than an ordinary monastery. "San
Girolamo is honeycombed with cells of Ustasha operatives,"
Gowen wrote on Feb. 12, 1947. "In order to enter this
monastery, one must submit to a personal search for weapons and
identification.... The whole area is guarded by armed Ustasha
youths in civilian clothes, and the Ustasha salute is exchanged
constantly." From a source inside the compound, Gowen even
managed to obtain Draganovic's secret files, which, Gowen
reported on Sept. 5, 1947, "indicate clearly Draganovic's
involvement in aiding and abetting the Ustasha to escape into
South America."
Another Croatian priest living at San Girolamo
was also active in smuggling war criminals, documents show. A
recently declassified memo, believed to have been written in 1946
by an agent of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS)the
precursor of the CIAreports that a priest called Father
Golik was supplying false passports and money to members of the
Ustasha. Golik, the memo says, was alleged to be "chief
sponsor of all Croats resident in Rome, with special attention to
the needs of former Ustasha members." The memo reports
allegations that the Ustashas "are given a monthly allowance
of 6,000 fire per person [the equivalent of $2,700 today], in
addition to the privilege of cheap meals at the San Girolamo
mess."
Croatian Catholic officials were funneling
money to war criminals even after they escaped to Argentina,
documents show. According to cable intercepts cited in a 1947
U.S. diplomatic report, Pavelic escaped in November 1947 to
Buenos Aires, where he was said to have been met by a retinue of
Catholic priests. Newly declassified documents also show that
Bishop Rozman was funneling money to South America from a Swiss
bank account set up "to aid refugees of the Catholic
religion." U.S. military attaché Davis Harrington reported
on March 9, 1948, that Rozman "is going to Bern to take care
of these finances. The money is in a Swiss bank, and he plans to
have most of it sent through to Italy and from there sent to the
Ustashas in Argentina."
Further clues about the path of Ustasha gold
are provided by Croatian National Bank records uncovered last
fall by an American historian of Croatian descent. According to
Jere Jareb, author of Gold and Money of the Independent State
of Croatia Moved Abroad, the documents show that 288
kilograms of gold was removed from the Croatian National Bank and
the state treasury on May 7,1945the day that Germany
capitulated. By Draganovic's own testimony, part of that treasure
landed in his hands. The "Golden Priest," as Draganovic
was known, acknowledged to the Yugoslav War Crimes Commission
that he doled the money out to Ustasha soldiers and Croatian
civilian refugees. (Though called to testify, Draganovic was
never charged. He later returned to Yugoslavia and died there in
1983).
When in Rome. But does any of
the evidence implicate the Vatican itself? The strongest
indication so far is a memo that first prompted the State
Department's interest. The memo, dated Oct. 21, 1946, was
discovered last summer in the declassified files of the U.S.
Treasury Department. Written by OSS agent Emerson Bigelow, it
reports that money sent by Ustasha from Croatia to Rome after the
war had been partly intercepted by the British, but that 200
million Swiss francsthe equivalent of $170 million
todaywere being held in the Vatican for safekeeping.
According to "rumor," the memo says, the money was
being used to finance Croatian war criminals in exile.
When the Bigelow memo was released last year,
the Vatican swiftly dismissed it, insisting that the charges
could not be true. But some researchers who have studied World
War II intelligence matters note that other archival documents
counter the notion that a Vatican-Ustasha link is implausible on
its face. One is a British diplomatic memo from Oct. 17, 1947,
cited in the 1991 book Unholy Trinity by journalist Mark
Aarons and former Justice Department Nazi-hunter John Loftus.
According to the memo, a San Giralomo priest named Father Mandic
was a "liaison to the Vatican" who was involved in
converting Ustasha gold, jewelry, and foreign exchange into
Italian fire.
Other reports mention Ustashas meeting with
Vatican officials or even living in the Vatican. The British
Foreign Office reported in January 1947 that Pavelic himself, by
that time a wanted war criminal, was living "within the
Vatican City." An earlier report by Gowen, in October 1946,
noted that Pavelic was in Rome and in contact with Draganovic.
Documents include accounts of Ustashas being hidden at the pope's
summer residence at Castel Gandolfo and being seen driving in
Rome in cars with Vatican license plates. The recently
declassified Golik memo reports that Ustashas ate at the papal
mess and that Father Golik was "declared to be in close
contact with the Vatican."
The Vatican's tolerance of the Ustasha during
the war was no secret. On the recommendation of Zagreb Archbishop
Alojzije Stepinacwho had blessed Pavelic at the opening of
the Croatian parliamentthe pope established informal
diplomatic relations with the independent state of Croatia, and
his envoy made regular rounds of Ustasha headquarters. In 1941
and in 1943, at a time when his excesses were known, Pavelic was
granted two private audiences with Pius XII. The pope explained
that he received the Ustasha leader simply as a Catholic, not as
head of the Croatian state. The pontiff's decision was widely
reportedand widely deploredat the time. In July 1941,
Francis D'Arcy Osborne, the British ambassador to the Vatican,
wrote: "[Pius's] reception of Pavelic ... has done more to
damage his reputation in this country than any other act since
the war began."
Bound to silence. What all
this intelligence means is at the heart of the State
Department-led investigation. Vatican officials insist they are
hiding nothing because they have nothing to hide. But they say
they cannot allow outside researchers free access to their
archives because the collection contains sensitive personnel
files. As a general rule, the Vatican releases church documents
only after about 75 years. "I am bound to silence,"
said the Rev. Marcel Chappin of the Vatican Secretariat of State,
when pressed to comment. Chappin said that the Vatican has
already published a voluminous account of its role in World War
II, including a discussion of the controversy surrounding Pius
XII, who kept silent on the Nazi atrocities because he believed
provocation of the Nazis would lead to more persecution and
because he considered the greater enemy to be atheistic
communism. Vatican defenders note that the church saved tens of
thousands of Jews during the war, and they urge that current
suspicions be viewed in the context of the chaotic times:
Refugees were streaming into Vatican City after the war, and it
is quite possible that funds intended for these refugees were
used to help war criminals without the pope's knowledge."
The question is what did the Vatican's own leadership know?"
says William Slaney, the State Department's historian and author
of the Nazi gold reports. "We want the Vatican . . . to deal
with [its] share of this dreadful event."
Nu we een tijdperk lijken binnen te treden waarin waarden en grote principes weer van stal worden gehaald, meestal om de goedgelovige zielen rustig en kalm te houden en vooral in hun zakken te zitten, is het goed even stil te staan bij de ware aard van het beestje. Met beestje bedoelen we ons economisch systeem beter bekend onder de naam kapitalisme. Hieronder een fijn voorbeeld:
VRT
schrijft:
"De Amerikaanse
zakenbank Goldman Sachs heeft rommelkredieten verkocht aan klanten om daarna op
de financiële markten te speculeren op verlies van diezelfde beleggingen.
Dat schrijft de Amerikaanse krant The New York Times.
Volgens de krant is er momenteel een onderzoek bezig tegen de praktijken van de
bank in het Amerikaanse congres en andere toezichthoudende instanties. Ook bij
andere grote banken zoals Deutsche Bank en Morgan Stanley zouden gelijkaardige
praktijken hebben bestaan. Hoewel het onderzoek nog verre van afgerond is, weet
The New York Times dat alles zou draaien rond het verkopen van rommelkredieten,
waarna de bank speculeerde op verlies van diezelfde beleggingen.
Concreet zou het gaan om een vorm van CDO's (collateralized debt obligations,
red.), schuldvorderingen die herverpakt worden met andere schuldvorderingen tot
een verhandelbaar financieel product. Veel van die CDO's hadden uiteindelijk
rommelhypotheken in de VS als onderpand, waardoor veel banken in de problemen
kwamen toen de huizenmarkt instortte. Sinds de kredietcrisis twee jaar geleden
losbarstte hebben banken wereldwijd al 200 miljard dollar verloren op CDO's in
hun portefeuille.
Cynisme zonder grenzen
Volgens The New York Times wisten bankiers dat hun CDO's zeer risicovol waren,
maar verkocht men ze toch om daarna op de beurs te speculeren op een verlies. "Het
is een van de meeste cynische dingen die ik ooit gehoord heb. Het is net alsof
je een brandverzekering aan iemand verkoopt om daarna zijn huis in brand te
steken", zegt een financieel analist in de krant.
De praktijk zou sinds 2005 zijn toegepast bij Goldman Sachs en andere banken op
een moment dat de huizenmarkt in de VS nog steeds aan het boomen was. Sommige
banken wisten dat de zeepbel niet kon blijven duren en besloten om zich in te
dekken tegen mogelijk verlies door te speculeren. Naar de buitenwereld bleef
men echter CDO's en andere financiële producten met hypotheken als onderpand
verkopen. Goldman Sachs zegt dat het niets illegaal heeft gedaan en wil eerst
het onderzoek afwachten.
Vandaag stellen we jullie voor aan één van de afgrijselijkste monsters uit WOII de franciscaner-priester Miroslav Filipovic beter bekend onder zijn koosnaampje "Broeder Satan of Fra Sotona". Deze vrome jongen sloeg er zelfs in om zich als ustachafascist te laten veroordelen door een nazirechtbank wegens oorlogsmisdaden. Hij werd wel vrij vlug in ere hersteld om kampcommandant te worden waarschijnlijk wegens zijn talrijke competenties als pure slachter van Orthodoxe Serviêrs, Joden en Roma en dit alles onder het goedkeurend oog van het Vaticaan. Want hij was niet alleen als franciscaan om dergelijke wreedheden te plegen maar nooit legde het Vaticaan en dus PIUS XII hen ook maar één strootje in de weg...
Miroslav Filipović (1915 - 1946) was a Herzegovina-born Croatian nationalist and Roman Catholic priest (later known as Tomislav Filipović and Tomislav Filipović-Majstorović) who was convicted of war crimes by both a German military court and a Yugoslav civil court and hanged in Belgrade.
Early life
Filipović's date of birth was 5 June 1915, but little else about his early years has been recorded.[1]. In 1938 he joined the Franciscan Order at Petrićevac monastery, Banja Luka, and took Tomislav as his religious name.[2] During 1941 his superior at the monastery reportedly urged Filipović to distance himself from the Ustaa,[citation needed] an organisation of extremist Croatian nationalists installed by the Axis Powers in April 1941 to rule in the Independent State of Croatia (ISC), a puppet state embracing Bosnia-Hercegovina as well as most of Croatia.[citation needed]
Filipović was assigned to a chaplaincy in the Rama-ćit region (in northern Herzegovina).[3] He did not take up the assignment and in January 1942, after completing his theological exams in Sarajevo[4], he became a military chaplain with the Ustaa.[5]
Ustaa Chaplain
Tomislav Filipović (later known as Tomislav Filipović-Majstorović)
was assigned to II Poglavnik Bodyguard Battalion. Statements by two
eyewitnesses and a senior German general alleged that on 7 February
1942, Filipović accompanied elements of his battalion in an operation
aimed at wiping out Serbs in the settlement of Drakulić, on the
northern outskirts of Banja Luka, and in two neighbouring villages,
Motike and argovac. A few Serbs survived, but overwhelmingly the
operation achieved its objective and more than 2,300 Serb civilians -
men, women and children - were killed, usually with axe or pick-axe. He
was nicknamed by his troops "the glorious one", and he ordered that
little Serbian children be brought before him, so that he could
laughter them with the traditional Ustae weapons: the knife and gun.
He and Father Zvonimir Brekalo would kill these children by cutting
their necks.[6]
Reports sent to Eugen Dido Kvaternik,
head of the state internal security service, from his Banja Luka office
and dated 9 and 11 February 1942, noted that the victims at argovac
included 52 children killed at the village primary school. The first of
these reports gives death tolls at the mine, the school and the three
villages which together total 2,287. The second revises the death toll
at the school from 37 to 52, bringing the toll to 2,302. [7]
Two teachers survived the school massacre: Dobrila Martinović, who
subsequently suffered a nervous breakdown, and Mara unjić (shown as
Tunjić in some documents) who gave evidence against Filipović at his
postwar trial in Belgrade. According to unjić's trial testimony
Filipović not only participated in the atrocity but also incited fellow
Ustae to act with extreme cruelty.[8]
By 1955 Martinović was teaching again, in the Bosnian village of
Siprage southeast of Banja Luka. She described the argovac school
massacre in conversations with a university professor, Jovo Jovanović
and with her headteacher, and her account was published in 1968. She
explained that she had no reason to be alarmed when Filipović arrived
at the school because he was based at the nearby Prebićevac monastery
and was often seen passing through the villages. On previous occasions
his manner had been friendly. The teacher recalled that when Filipović
and some Ustae entered her classroom, the children looked on with
curiosity but no fear. But Filipović took a child, Vasilija Glamočanin,
and "slaughtered her with a knife" in front of the class. He urged the
Ustaa troops who accompanied him to deal similarly with the other
children and assured them that he would take the sin upon himself.[9] Viktor Novak had attributed a similar account to Martinović in Magnum crimen,
but embellished it, like some other passages in the same book, with
grotesque and sometimes improbable detail: As each child passed, an
Ustaa would gouge out an eye and push it into the child's slit belly
etc. Similar atrocities occurred on 12 February 1942 at two more
villages in the area, Piskavica and Ivanjska (now Potkozarje), but
there is no concrete evidence that Filipović was involved in those
events.[10] Also available, as of August 2008, in English at www.serbianunity.net.
Officers of the German occupying authority were dismayed by the
February massacres, fearing that they would provoke uprisings among the
civilian population of the region.[11]
Filipović was court-martialed by the Germans for his involvement,
possibly at the request of the Italian army which was then occupying
part of the ISC territory.[12] In his testimony to a Croatian state commission set up after World War II
to investigate war crimes by the occupation forces and their
collaborators, Filipović said he neither participated in, nor even
attended, the 7 February massacres.[13] However, General Edmund Glaise-Horstenau,
the senior German officer in the region, implicated Filipović in a
report where he stated that as well as being present "during the
slaughtering" the priest had attended a planning meeting prior to the
massacres, along with certain other Catholic priests. He reported that
the Ustaa's former city chief in Banja Luka, Viktor Gutić, and the
city's court president, a Dr. Stilinović, were also at the meeting.[14] On 4 April 1942 Filipović was suspended from his chaplaincy post[15] by the papal legate in Zagreb and jailed in Croatia.[12]
Through the direct intervention of Vjekoslav "Maks" Luburić,[16] who then headed Section III of the ISC internal security service (Ustaka Narodna Sluba), which was responsible for administering the puppet state's system of prison camps [17], Filipović was quickly released and posted to the Jasenovac complex of labour and death camps
where he was at first an inmate with benefited status, who aided the
Ustase, and later appointed Ustase, commanding a small transit camp
nigh Jasenovac, in early 1942, He reportedly killed an inmate there for
hiding a loaf of bread.[18]
Shortly thereafter he became chief-guard, responsible for
mass-executions and lieutenant of the commander Ljubo Milos and
administrator Ivica Matković, and later, on 10 June 1942, administrator
of the main camp in their stead, until the return of Matković, in March
1942.[16][19]
Luburić gave Filipović a new surname, "Majstorović", derived from a
local word meaning "master" or "craftsman". From then on documents
referred to him sometimes by that name and sometimes as
Filipović-Majstorović. One event that had him noted for being
overly-cruel, was his apparent victory in a bet placed by him, Marinko
Polić and Jerko Maricić, both infamous NCOs in the camp. Witness Josip
Riboli stated:
Majstorović, Polić and Maricić competed over which of them was a
better butcher. Victims had to kneel in front of them until they were
touching their foreheads to the ground, and the executioners would fire
their revolvers at the backs of their heads. If death wasn't instant,
one of them would grab a knife and slit the victim's throat.[20]
Commandant of Jasenovac
After the war Filipović admitted that he had personally killed about
100 prisoners and had attended mass executions of many more. He
estimated that under his command some 20-30,000 prisoners were
liquidated at the main Jasenovac camp. He said prisoners would often be
made to stand in prepared trenches where each was then killed with a
sledgehammer blow.[21]
Filipović went on to describe his tenure in command of Stara Gradika,
a prison camp primarily for women which was designated Camp V within
the Jasenovac system:
I [was at] Stara
Gradika from the end of October 1942 until 27 March 1943. During that
time mass liquidations were performed, usually outside the camp, for
instance in Mlaka and Jablanac, but some were sent off to Jasenovac
too. Such large transports for liquidations were carried out by the
order of Matković Ivica (i.e. Ivica Matković), and in this way 2-3,000
people were sent away. On 16 April 1945 I returned to Jasenovac, where
I stayed until the end. I know that at the time corpses of prisoners
from Gradina were being exhumed and burned, in order to cover up traces
of what had been done. I didnt participate in the liquidation of the
last prisoners, but only in exhumation.[21]
After hearing from 62 Jasenovac survivors, whom it listed usually
with complete addresses, the war-crimes commission in 1946 counted
Filipović among 13 Ustae who stood out for their brutality and
direct involvement in the killing. It reported that even the cruelty of
Ljubo Milo,
notorious for slashing prisoners to death in a mock clinic, was
surpassed in sadism by Filipović. The commission saw Filipović's
statement as a crucial acknowledgement of his participation in
atrocities, but in respect of the numbers he had given it noted: All
witnesses interviewed, who were prisoners themselves, speak with
complete consistency and certainty of a far greater number, especially
in regards to the number of victims killed by Majstorovic himself." The
commission cited one witness, Tomo Krkac, who had described seeing
Filipović very often shooting prisoners during so-called public
executions and forcing prisoners to kill other prisoners with
sledgehammers.[22]
In one of the first published memoirs about life and death in the
Jasenovac complex, a Croatian medical doctor and academic, Dr. Nikola
Nikolić, who had been imprisoned in Camp III, described his first
meeting with Filipović: His voice had an almost feminine quality which
was at odds with his physical stature and coarse face. Nikolić
recalled standing in the second row of a group of prisoners who had
been lined up to watch as another group of prisoners were herded in
front of Filipović. Filipovović called Nikolić to the front so that, as
a doctor, he could witness our surgery being performed without
anaesthetic. Filipović then shot dead two prisoners and told a
colleague to finish off the rest.[23]
Nikolić quotes another survivor, Josip Riboli: Compared with
Matković and Milo, whose faces revealed the baseness of their inner
natures, Filipović Majstorović seemed kind and gentle - except when the
slaughtering was going on. Then he was incomparable. He was the leader
of all the mass killings at Gradina. He went off to conduct the
slaughtering every night and came back covered with blood.[23]
Riboli also gave evidence to the Croatian war-crimes commission.
According to the accounts of some survivors, Filipović continued to act
as a chaplain while commanding the camp and sometimes wore his
Franciscan robes while carrying out his crimes.[24]
As a result he came to be known among prisoners as Fra Sotona
(Brother Satan). There is no evidence that he was excommunicated by
the Catholic Church, but he was removed from the Franciscan order on 22
October 1942, the date on which he was transferred to Stara Gradika.[15]
In 1981 a Banja Luka priest stated that Filipović told him, in the
month after he relinquished command at Jasenovac, that he was guilty of
crimes at the camp but was innocent of involvement in the massacres in
and around Drakulić in February 1942.[25] In September 1944, Filipović, along with Dinko akić and others, was appointed to sit on an ad hoc court-martial convened to try prisoners accused of forging links with the Partisans
and plotting an escape. The Croatian War Crimes Commission in its
report was at a loss to explain why such a process had been deemed
necessary when Ustae had already killed thousands of people by
heinous means, without any justification or procedure. It reported
that all 31 accused prisoners were hanged after undergoing severe
torture including blindings, crushed fingers and blow-lamp burns.
Filipović in his testimony said: We (the court-martial) didnt
investigate anything, we only signed the verdicts. A witness, Dervis
Sarać, recalled how three gypsies were brought to play music before
Filipović, who, disappointed by the music, shot one and sent the others
to death.[26] Another witness accuses him of having shot an inmate while eating lunch, after which deed he resumed eating.[27]
Commandant of Stara Gradika
As chief of camp Stara Gradika, which predominantly housed women
and children, Miroslav Filipović-Majstorović excelled in sadism. A
Jewish survivor of Jasenovac, Egon Berger, has described Filipovićs
sadistic killing of children,[28]
while two other witnesses, imo Klaić and Dragutin krgatić: Klaić
recalls that in Christmas 1942, Miroslav ordered mass and later a
muster, where he killed four inmates with a knife, while forcing a Jew
of Sarajevo, Alkalaj, to sing, then ordering Alkalaj to near him,
stabbing him in the chest and slashing his throat. Then he killed 56
Bosnian Jews by tying them with wire, hitting them with an axe so they
all fell into a well. Then he shot 42 Bosnian villagers in the head[29] krgatić confirmed that Filipović shot 40 villagers in the head after mass, adding:"In
Majstorović's time, musters and executions were frequent. Friar
Majstorović favored a mystical approach to the killings.... After he
killed them, sat on a chair and said 'justice has been done".[30] Ivan Palcec, a witness, added that Filipović shot nine inmates that day for an escape attempt[31]. Witness Josip Erlih recalls Miroslav shooting at eight inmates to death.[32]
Post-WW2
In 1946 Filipović stood trial in Belgrade for war crimes. He gave
evidence consistent with his statement to the Croatian war-crimes
commission, admitting his participation in some crimes and denying
involvement in others.[citation needed] He was found guilty and sentenced to death. He was hanged wearing his friars robes.[citation
De meest linkse analyse van de financiële crisis van het (bijna) voorbije jaar vonden we in de patronale krant De Tijd. Dat zegt natuurlijk meer over het ontbreken van dergelijke analyses bij niet-patronale kranten als die er nog zouden zijn wat we ten zeerste betwijfelen...Maar dus een mooi werkstukje dat zeker mag gelezen worden en dat onze goedkeuring als hangmatsocialisten wegdraagt:
De Tijd schrijft:
"Auteur is Joseph E. Stiglitz is hoogleraar aan de Columbia University en
kreeg in 2001 de Nobelprijs voor economie. Zijn jongste boek,
Freefall, komt uit in januari.
Het beste wat we over 2009 kunnen zeggen, is dat het erger had gekund, dat we
niet in de afgrond zijn gestort waar we eind 2008 leken voor te staan, en dat
2010 voor de meeste landen bijna zeker beterschap brengt. De wereld heeft ook
een paar waardevolle lessen geleerd, weliswaar ten koste van onze welvaart. Eigenlijk
hadden we daar niet zon hoge prijs voor hoeven te betalen, aangezien we
die lessen al hadden moeten kennen.
De eerste les is dat de markten zichzelf niet
corrigeren. Zonder een adequate regelgeving zijn ze geneigd tot excessen. In
2009 hebben we opnieuw vastgesteld waarom de onzichtbare hand van de Schotse
econoom Adam Smith vaak onzichtbaar lijkt: hij is er niet. De bankiers jagen
hun eigenbelang na (hebzucht) en dat heeft de samenleving weinig goed gedaan. Zelfs
hun aandeel- en obligatiehouders hebben er weinig baat bij gehad. En de woningeigenaars
die hun huis verliezen, de werknemers die hun baan kwijt zijn, de
gepensioneerden die hun pensioenfondsen in rook zagen opgaan of de
belastingbetalers die honderden miljarden hebben betaald om de banken te
redden, al helemaal niet.
Door het dreigende vooruitzicht dat het hele systeem
ineen zou storten werd het vangnet, dat bedoeld was om onfortuinlijke personen
te helpen het hoofd boven water te houden, op gulle wijze ook gespannen onder
commerciële banken, en vervolgens onder zakenbanken, verzekeringsmaatschappijen,
autobedrijven en zelfs verstrekkers van autoleningen. Nooit eerder is zoveel
geld van zoveel mensen getransfereerd naar zo weinigen.
We zijn gewend aan het idee dat de overheid geld van
de rijken aan de armen geeft. In dit geval zijn het de armen en de middenklasse
die hun geld aan de rijken hebben gegeven. De al onder een zware last gebukt
gaande belastingbetalers moesten toezien hoe hun geld, dat de banken moest
helpen weer krediet te verschaffen om de economie nieuw leven in te blazen,
voor buitensporige bonussen en dividenden werd gebruikt. Dividenden zouden een
deel van de winst moeten voorstellen, in dit geval was het gewoon een blijk van
de vrijgevigheid van de regering.
De rechtvaardiging was dat het redden van de banken,
hoe stuntelig ook, de kredietverschaffing weer op gang zou brengen. Maar dat is
niet gebeurd. Het enige wat is gebeurd, is dat de gemiddelde belastingbetaler
zijn geld heeft gegeven aan dezelfde instellingen die hem jarenlang hebben
uitgeknepen door middel van roofleningen, woekerintresten op kredietkaarten en
ondoorzichtige commissies.
De reddingen hebben overal een diepgewortelde
hypocrisie blootgelegd. Wie voor budgettaire beheersing had gepleit als het om
kleinschalige welvaartsprogrammas voor de armen ging, stond nu te
juichen om s werelds grootste welvaartsprogramma. Wie de transparantie
van de vrije markt had geroemd, creëerde uiteindelijk financiële systemen die
zo ondoorzichtig waren dat de banken niet meer wijs geraakten uit hun eigen
balansen. En ten slotte stortte ook de overheid zich in steeds minder
transparante reddingsoperaties, om haar vrijgevigheid ten aanzien van de banken
te verdoezelen. Wie gepleit had voor verantwoording en
verantwoordelijkheid vroeg de schulden van de financiële sector
kwijt te schelden.
marktfalen
De tweede belangrijke les is begrijpen waarom markten
vaak niet functioneren zoals bedoeld. Er zijn vele redenen voor marktfalen. In
dit geval hadden de financiële instellingen die too big to fail
waren een perverse incentive: als ze succes hadden met gokken, staken ze de
winst op zak. Als ze verloren, zou de belastingbetaler wel betalen.
Bovendien functioneren markten vaak niet goed als de
informatie niet helemaal klopt, en laat het nu net daar schorten in de
financiële sector. Externe factoren werken ver door: het faillissement van één
bank zadelt andere banken op met kosten, en het falen van het financieel
systeem deed belastingbetalers en werknemers overal ter wereld daarvoor
opdraaien.
Stimulansen
De derde les is dat Keynesiaans beleid wel degelijk
werkt. Landen, zoals Australië, die al vroeg omvangrijke en uitgekiende
stimulansprogrammas hebben uitgevoerd, zijn de crisis sneller te boven
gekomen. Andere landen zijn bezweken voor de oude economische orthodoxie,
daarbij geholpen door de financiële tovenaars aan wie we deze knoeiboel te
danken hebben.
Wanneer een economie in recessie is, verschijnen de
begrotingstekorten, omdat de belastinginkomsten sneller dalen dan de uitgaven. De
oude orthodoxie hield voor dat je het begrotingstekort moest dichten - door de
belastingen te verhogen of in de uitgaven te snoeien - om het vertrouwen
te herstellen. Maar dat beleid heeft er bijna altijd toe geleid dat de
geaggregeerde vraag daalde, de economie nog verder in het slop geraakte en het
vertrouwen nog meer ondermijnd werd. Dat hebben we onlangs nog gezien toen het
Internationaal Monetair Fonds (IMF) in de jaren 90 op zon beleid hamerde
in Oost-Azië.
inflatie
De vierde les is dat een monetair beleid voeren meer
omvat dan inflatiebestrijding. Te veel de nadruk leggen op inflatie betekende
dat sommige centrale banken niet wisten wat er met hun financiële markten aan
de hand was. De kostprijs van een milde inflatie is miniem in vergelijking met
de kosten voor de economie als de centrale banken vermogensbubbels
ongecontroleerd laten groeien.
innovatie
De vijfde les is dat niet alle innovatie een
efficiëntere en productievere economie voortbrengt, laat staan een betere
samenleving. En wanneer privé-incentives niet goed afgestemd zijn op het
maatschappelijk rendement kan dat leiden tot het nemen van overdreven
risicos, tot overdreven kortzichtig gedrag en tot scheefgetrokken
innovatie. Een voorbeeld: hoewel de voordelen van de vernieuwingen op het
gebied van financiële financieringstechnieken van de voorbije jaren moeilijk
kunnen worden aangetoond, laat staan becijferd, zijn de maatschappelijke en
economische kosten die eraan verbonden zijn duidelijk en enorm.
De financiële engineering heeft geen producten
opgeleverd die gewone burgers zouden helpen om het eenvoudige risico van het
bezitten van een woning te beheren. Bijgevolg zijn miljoenen hun huis kwijt en
zullen nog een paar miljoen hun huis waarschijnlijk verliezen. In de plaats
daarvan waren de nieuwe producten bedoeld om wie niet zo hoog opgeleid is nog
meer uit te buiten, en om regelgevingen en boekhoudkundige normen te omzeilen,
terwijl die bedoeld waren om de efficiëntie en de stabiliteit van de markten te
verhogen. Als gevolg daarvan hebben de financiële markten, die verondersteld
worden risicos te beheren en kapitaal efficiënt aan te wenden,
risicos gecreëerd en lukraak geld uitgegeven.
We zullen snel genoeg ontdekken of we deze keer meer
van de crisis leren dan in het verleden. Maar als de hervormingen van de
financiële sector in de Verenigde Staten en de andere geavanceerde
industrielanden in 2010 niet sneller vorderen, zouden we jammer genoeg nog een
tweede zittijd kunnen krijgen.
Jasenovac voor zoiets mag geen enkele taal een naam hebben...
Vandaag geven we jullie een beeld van de kampen die de
marionettenregering van Ante Pavelic in het Nazi-Kroatië had opgericht
en een klein idee van de wreedheid van de Ustacha-militie die het kamp
bewaakte. Zelfs de Duitsers vonden het te gortig en die waren toen al
wel wat gewoon...
Jasenovac staat als derde op de lijst van de kampen waar de meeste
mensen werden vermoord. Het exacte cijfer zal nooit bekend raken
vermits de dossiers werden vernietigd maar men schat het aantal
slachtoffers zonder enige overdrijving op zeshonderdduizend...
Hieronder een gedetailleerd verslag:
Entry in Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, edited by Yisrael Gutman, vol. 1, 1995, pp. 739-740
JASENOVAC,
the largest concentration and extermination camp in CROATIA. Jasenovac
was in fact a complex of several subcamps, in close proximity to each
other, on the bank of the Sava River, about 62 miles (100 km) south of
Zagreb. The women s camp of Stara Gradika, which was farther away,
also belonged to this complex.
Jasenovac was established in
August 1941 and was dismantled only in April 1945. The creation of the
camp and its management and supervision were entrusted to Department
III of the Croatian Security Police (Ustaka Narodna Sluba: UNS),
headed by Vjekoslav (Maks) Luburić, who was personally responsible for
everything that happened. Some six hundred thousand people were
murdered at Jasenovac, mostly Serbs, Jews, Gypsies, and opponents of
the USTASA regime. The number of Jewish victims was between twenty
thousand and twenty-five thousand, most of whom were murdered there up
to August 1942, when deportation of the Croatian Jews to Auschwitz for
extermination began. Jews were sent to Jasenovac from all parts of
Croatia (and Bosnia and Herzegovina, e. n.) from Zagreb, from Sarajevo,
and from other cities and smaller towns. On their arrival most were
killed at execution sites near the camp: Granik, Gradina, and other
places. Those kept alive were mostly skilled at needed professions and
trades (doctors, pharmacists, electricians, shoemakers, goldsmiths, and
so on) and were employed in services and workshops at Jasenovac. The
living conditions in the camp were extremely severe: a meager diet,
deplorable accommodations, a particularly cruel regime, and
unbelievably cruel behavior by the Ustae guards. The conditions
improved only for short periods during visits by delegations, such as
the press delegation that visited in February 1942 and a Red Cross
delegation in June 1944.
Three slaughterers and a commandant of the Jasenovac camp: Stipe Prpić, friar Miroslav Filipović-Majstorović, and Jerko Maričić
The
acts of murder and of cruelty in the camp reached their peak in the
late summer of 1942, when tens of thousands of Serbian villagers were
deported to Jasenovac from the area of the fighting against the
partisans in the Kozara Mountains. Most of the men were killed at
Jasenovac. The women were sent for forced labor in Germany, and the
children were taken from their mothers; some were murdered and others
were dispersed in orphanages throughout the country.
In
April 1945 the partisan army approached the camp. In an attempt to
erase traces of the atrocities, the Ustae blew up all the
installations and killed most of the internees. An escape attempt by
the prisoners failed, and only a few survived.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Romano, J. Jews of Yugoslavia, 1941-1945: Victims of Genocide and Freedom Fighters. Belgrade, 1982. Sindik, D., ed. Sećanja Jevreja na logor Jasenovac, Belgrade, 1972.
Map of Jasenovac camps
Drawing of the camp
Plan of the camp
I. THE CREATION OF THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF CROATIA - 1941
After
the short-lived war in April of 1941, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was
divided among the aggressor countries: Nazi Germany, fascist Italy,
Horti's Hungary and Boris III's Bulgaria. In the meantime, while the
war was still being fought, the founding of the Ustasha's Independent
State of Croatia (abbreviated as NDH from the Serbo-Croatian "Nezavisna
Drava Hrvatska") was proclaimed on April 10, 1941; territories besides
those which were traditionally settled by the Croats were grafted into
this state, including all of Bosnia- Herzegovina and parts of Serbia.
There
were more than two million Serbs living in the newly created puppet
state, who made up one third of the entire population of the NDH. There
were also significant numbers of Jews, Romanies and members of other
national groups. As soon as the NDH was proclaimed, the leader of this
Italo-German fabrication, the head of the Ustasha named Ante Pavelić,
began to carry out the Ustasha's program of the creation of a "purely
Croatian area for living" and a "pure Croat nation". Namely, since the
Ustasha were extreme nationalists, chauvinists and racists, they began
to build their own state and institutions which reflected those of Nazi
Germany. According to their ideologists, the condition for the creation
of a purely Croatian state would be the expulsion of the Serbs
("Greek-Easterners"), the Jews ("idovi") and the Romanies ("Gypsies").
Claiming that the Serbs were both racially and religiously different
from the Croats, they killed them, deported them or forcibly converted
them. The Jews and Romanies were to be completely annihilated as they
were considered to be lower races. The Ustasha government and its
jurisdiction passed a series of laws, orders and regulations by which
Nazi-fascist methods of terror and ethnic genocide were made legal (the
Regulation on the Outlawing of the Cyrillic Alphabet, the Regulation on
Racial Affiliation, the Regulation on Citizenship, the Regulation on
Conversion from One Religion to Another, and so on). Yet, the most
massive crime against the Serbs, Jews and Romanies was carried out
outside the framework of those laws and legal documents. The Ustasha
acted on their racial, religious and national intolerance without
regard for any kind of laws or norms. The Ustasha government was
supported by the greater part of the Catholic clergy and the Muslim
religious community, and the Croatian Peasant also pledged their
allegiance to the Ustasha government.
II. THE BEGINNING OF THE GENOCIDE OF THE SERBS, JEWS, AND ROMANIES IN THE NDH
The
Ustasha's organization was a typically fascist organization and its
military strength was an instrument for the implementation of the
Ustasha's Nazi ideology.
The Ustasha army (Ustaka
vojnica) was organized by Slavko Kvaternik, the second in command
and it was made up of Ustasha units (filled out with volunteers) under
the direction of the Central Ustasha Headquarters, of special police
units (redarstvo) and the Home Guard (domobrani), and in August of
1941 the Ustasha Secret Service (abbreviated UNS after the
Serbo-Croatian (Ustaka Nadzorna Sluzhba) was formed, with Eugen -
Dido Kvaternik at its head. With the aid of these organizations, the
greatest kind of genocide was carried out against the Serbs, Jews and
Romanies in the NDH. In order to make it possible for only Croats and
Muslims to live in the NDH, the mass physical destruction, expulsion
and forcible conversion of the Serbs was carried out, along with the
systematic extermination of the Jews, and the almost complete
destruction of the Romanies. The mass murder of the Serbs began already
at the end of April, 1941, with the massacres in the villages around
Bjelovar, in Banija in May, in Lika in June, in Kordun, in Bosnian
Krajina and in Herzegovina. It is thought that just in the period from
April, 1941, to the middle of August, 1942, over 600,000 Serbs were
killed in the most brutal ways imaginable, and during the entire war
over 180,000 Serbs were deported to Serbia proper.
Jewish children being sent to Jasenovac
The
terror of the NDH government was especially aimed at the Serbian
Orthodox Church. Three Orthodox bishops and most of the Orthodox
priests were murdered by the end of 1941 in the cruelest of manners.
During the war, 450 Orthodox churches were demolished. The exact number
of Serbs forcibly converted to Catholicism has never been established.
III. CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF CROATIA
According
to the example of their protectors, Nazi Germany and the other fascist
regimes, concentration camps were founded in the NDH for the purpose of
purifying the nation of undesirables. The Ustasha called them
collection or work camps, and they were designed for the mass
internment and systematic total destruction of Serbs, Jews, Romanies,
and objectionable Croats. The so-called Ustasha Secret Service (or
rather its) Department III which was also called the Ustasha Guard
was in charge of the founding, organization and management of the
concentration camps in the NDH. Although they were actually the same,
Department III took care of the founding, organization and management
of the camps, while the Ustasha Guard was assigned to forming
military units which guarded the camps and carried out the task of
transporting the Serb and Jewish people from the surrounding
territories to the camps, and they were also those who killed the
prisoners.
The first camps in the NDH were founded on the
island of Pag at the place called Slano, on Mount Velebit near Gospić
at a place called Jadovno, and in Bosnia at Kručica near Travnik.
Besides Jasenovac, the larger camps were: Danica in Koprivnica,
Kerestinec, Lobograd, Stara Gradika, Lepoglava, Jastrebarsko and
Sisak. In the beginning there were no legal regulations about sending
people to camps or the length of sentences. Such things were decided by
Pavelić's emissaries, district prefects, deputy prefects, camp
supervisors and other Ustasha commanders. Such practices remained even
later, and when the regulations were finally passed no one obeyed them.
The first commander of Department III (the Ustasha Guard)
and thus of the camps as well, was the Ustasha Mijo Babić alias
Giovani, who was followed by Vjekoslav Luburić alias Maks. On the
orders of Pavelić and Kvaternik, Luburić spent time in Germany as a
guest of the Gestapo at the beginning of October, 1941, at which time
he visited several German concentration camps. Upon returning to the
NDH, he carried out a re-organization of the existing camps and founded
new ones modelled after those in Germany, and formed a powerful
military unit of the Ustasha Guard who carried out mass crimes
directly under his command.
IV THE FOUNDING OF THE JASENOVAC CONCENTRATION CAMP
The
Ustasha camp called Jasenovac was founded according to the model of
camps in Nazi Germany, on August 21, 1941. it was the largest place of
torture and execution which ever existed in Yugoslavia. With its
horrors it was the largest concentration camp, and it was the third in
the number of victims in all of occupied Europe, during the war years
1941-1945. With their sadism and pathological crimes, the Ustasha
outdid even their Nazi German masters.
Unlike the German
camps where industrialized genocide was conducted, in Jasenovac that
genocide was done in a way never recorded in the history of the human
race. All which was negative, pathological and criminal, which
characterized the Ustasha movement as a whole, reached its peak in
Jasenovac.
The Jasenovac camp spread out over 210 square
kilometers, along the Sava River from Stara Gradika in the east to the
village Krapje in the west, and from Strug in the north to the line
between Draksenić to Bistrica in the south.
The choice of
the wider region of Jasenovac for such a monstrous camp was made for
several reasons. One of them was certainly the suitable geographic
position. The Zagreb-Belgrade railway was in the vicinity and was
important for the transport of the prisoners. The terrain was
surrounded by the rivers Sava, Una and Velika Struga, in the middle of
the swampy Lonjsko Polje area, so that escape from the camp was almost
impossible. On the other side of the Sava, the Gradina region was
hardly accessible and often flooded by the river, uninhabited and far
from all witnesses. It was the ideal place for hiding mass murders. The
other possible reason for the choice of this place were the existing
factories there; these were workshops for the making of chains,
blacksmith shops, locksmith shops, brick factories, lumber mills and so
on, so the camp was easy to present in public as a work camp.
V THE JASENOVAC CAMP SYSTEM
The
Jasenovac concentration camp encompassed a system of camps along the
Sava River, on the flood plain of the Lonjsko polje area.
The
Ustasha's newspapers announced to the public, on August 23, 1941, that
the first barracks for prisoners had been built near the villages of
Bročice and Krapje, and that the camps would be used for the draining
of Lonjsko Polje. In fact, that was the founding of the Jasenovac camp,
or more precisely, Camp II called Bročice - Versajev and Camp 11
called Krapje, to which the first prisoners were brought, Jews and
Serbs from the Ustasha camps of Slano and Jadovno. In the beginning the
prisoners actually worked on building the dike, but under indescribably
hard conditions and terror. Those who did not die from the exhausting
work and hunger, being immediately buried in the dike, were killed when
the camp was liquidated. In November of 1941, Camp III Ciglana (which
means brickyard) was opened - the so-called III which quickly became
the camp with the central management function for all collection and
concentration camps in the NDH. The center of the camp lay beneath the
village Jasenovac in the area of the industrial complex where the
brickyard actually was, and that is how it got its name. Three-fourths
of Camp III were surrounded by a wall 3 to 5 meters high, into which
seven concrete bunkers were built and which had several guard towers.
In front of the wall were three lines of tangled barbed wire, and in
some places they were electrified. The fourth side of the camp faced
the River Sava. As an integral part of Camp 111-C there was a special
Ustasha Secret Service prison for specially selected prisoners.
Camp
IV Koara (which means tannery) was found in the village of
Jasenovac, and prisoners worked in the tannery there under the most
difficult of conditions. Camp V - Stara Gradika belonged
organizationally to the Jasenovac camp system. In the overall area of
the Jasenovac camp three other special camps were organized. In the
village Utica, on the delta of the Una and Sava, an improvised Gypsy
camp was located, where mainly Romanies were brought and killed, and
the villages Mlaka and Jablanac were turned into collection camps for
women and children.
VI THE PLACES OF EXECUTION IN JASENOVAC
The
system of mass murder in Jasenovac was already in place in the fall of
1941, as soon as the larger transports of people began to arrive. The
men, women and children arrived here by rail, truck, horse-drawn cart,
or simply running at the insistence of the Ustasha with rifles. Places
of mass execution were found all over the Jasenovac camp. Most of them
were located on the right bank of the Sava from the Dubički limepits
downriver, and especially in the village Gradina. According to forensic
science research, over half of all the victims were killed here. Murder
of the prisoners was also carried out in the forest near the Krapje
Camp, near the Versaj Camp and Utica Camp on the whole left bank
of the Sava, downriver from Jasenovac to Jablanac and Mlaka.
Furthermore, within the complex of Camp III there was also a
crematorium which was actually an oven for baking bricks; the Ustasha
converted it according to the plans of Hinko Picili so that they could
bum the prisoners in it. Within this circle, besides Picili's
Furnaceo, there were also other places where people were tortured and
killed and they were called Lančara, Tunel, Granik. Zvonara,
Sablasno jezero, and so on.
In the Camp of Stara Gradika,
torture and murder were done in the cellars of the old Austrian
Fortress, in the tower of the fortress and on the banks of the Sava.
The
extent to which the system of killing was developed is witnessed to by
a memorandum from the Headquarters Chief on April 27, 1942, directed to
all Ustasha units and institutions, stating the collection and work
camp at Jasenovac can receive an unlimited number of prisoners.
VII METHODS AND MEANS OF THE MASS EXTERMINATION OF PEOPLE IN JASENOVAC
From
the summer of 1941 to the spring of 1945, death in Jasenovac took
numerous forms. The prisoners and all those who ended up in Jasenovac
had their throats cut by the Ustasha with specially designed knives, or
they were killed with axes, mallets and hammers; they were also shot,
or they were hung from trees or light poles. Some were burned alive in
hot furnaces, boiled in cauldrons, or drowned in the River Sava.
Here
the most varied forms of torture were used: finger and toe nails were
pulled out with metal instruments, eyes were dug out with specially
constructed hooks, people were blinded by having needles stuck in their
eyes, flesh was cut and then salted. People were also flayed, had their
noses, ears and tongues cut off with wire cutters, and had awls stuck
in their hearts. Daughters were raped in front of their mothers, sons
were tortured in front of their fathers. Said plainly, in the
concentration camps at Jasenovac and Stara Gradika, the Ustasha
surpassed all that even the sickest mind could imagine and do in terms
of the brutal way people were murdered.
People in Jasenovac were no longer human beings, but rather objects which were available for the every whim of the Ustasha.
Even
the Nazi generals were amazed at the horrors of Jasenovac. Thus,
General von Horstenau, Hitler's representative in Zagreb, wrote in his
personal diary for 1942 that the Ustasha camps in the NDH were the
epitome of horror, and Arthur Hefner, a German transport officer for
work forces in the Reich, wrote on November 11, 1942 of Jasenovac: The
concept of the Jasenovac camp should actually be understood as several
camps which are several kilometers apart, grouped around Jasenovac.
Regardless of the propaganda, this is one of the most horrible of
camps, which can only be compared to Dante's Inferno.
VIII WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THE JASENOVAC CAMP
Many
women, often with their children, were brought to Jasenovac. The whole
village of Mlaka was turned into a women's work camp. Women were forced
to do exhausting agricultural work in the vicinity. Executions were
performed in the very close proximity of the villages of Mlaka and
Jablanac.
Children at Jasenovac
In
the process of purifying the Croatian nation, Serbian children were
the first to be executed, together with the adults, even if they were
still on their mothers's breasts. During the four years between April,
1941 to May 1945, tens of thousands of children were killed in the
Ustasha's NDH. The youngest were still in the cradle, while the oldest
were about 14 years of age. During the Second World War, the only place
where there were special camps for children was Croatia.
From
December, 1941, to April, 1945, in Jasenovac, the Ustasha killed 19.544
boys and girls of Serbian nationality, and their identities were later
established. They were executed in atrocious ways and also died, more
than the adults, from illnesses, famine, thirst, and frost. The Ustasha
would drown small children in the Sava by tying up several of them in a
sack and throwing them into the river. Many children (about 400 of
them) were slaughtered in Jasenovac in mid-September, 1942. The
children taken in 15 horse-drawn carts to the brickyard and burnt. A
very similar fate befell the 300 kids who executed in Gradina on the
afternoon of October -N. 1942.
IX PUBLIC PRESENTATION OF THE JASENOVAC CAMP
To
the outside world, Jasenovac was presented as a work camp. The
Ustasha's propaganda tried to present the concentration camps both to
their own people and to the world as places of useful work and
reformation.
The wider area of the camp was strictly
guarded. Only the confirmed Ustasha with specific tasks were allowed
in. Even the Germans, as allies and friends, were not allowed to
enter the camp freely. However, under pressure from abroad, especially
from the Germans, on February 6, 1942, an International Committee
visited the Camp to see the way of living and working in it. In that
delegation, the Pope's emissary was also included, Monsignor G.
Massuci.
Three days before that, Ljubo Milo, the commandant
of the Jasenovac camps, had summoned all the prisoners and ordered them
to clean the camp, tidy the dining room, kitchen, and hospital. The
prisoners were given the sort of food that they had never had, or would
have. After this visit the photographs of the workers at their
machines in well-equipped workshops, and of the camp clinics with the
staff in immaculately clean white uniforms, were sent to the world from
Jasenovac. The camp was presented in such a way that it seemed
desirable to be in Jasenovac in that war time of general uncertainty,
death, and poverty, without the slightest premonition of what was,
actually hidden behind those photographs.
X THE BREAKOUT OF THE PRISONERS AND THE LIBERATION OF THE CAMP
At
the beginning of April 1945, the Ustasha were preparing the liquidation
of the Jasenovac camp in order to remove the traces of their crimes
before escaping. The ultimate liquidation of the Camp was begun on
April 20, when the last large group of women and children was executed.
On April 22, 1945, under the leadership of Ante Vukotić, about 600
people armed with bricks, poles, hammers and other things, broke down
the doors, shattered windows and ran out of the building. About 470
people were sick and unable to fight barehanded with the armed Ustasha,
so they did not take part in the rebellion. The 150 meter long path to
the east gate of the camp was covered by the crossfire of the Ustasha
machine-guns, and many prisoners were killed there. A large number of
them was killed on the wires of the camp. A hundred prisoners managed
to break through the broken gate of the camp. Only 80 prisoners
survived while 520 of them died in the first assault. The remaining 470
within the camp were later killed by the Ustasha.
The
captives, 167 of them, from the so-called Koara part of the
Jasenovac camp, about 8 p.m. on April 22 also began mortal combat under
the leadership of Stanko Gaćea and Zahid Bukurević. 150 of them
managed to break through, but they were surrounded and fired at so
heavily that only 11 prisoners survived.
The Jasenovac camp
was not liquidated until the very last battles were being fought. The
Yugoslav Army forces entered the Stara Gradika camp on April 23, and
Jasenovac on May 2, 1945. Before leaving the camp, the Ustasha killed
the remaining prisoners, blasted and destroyed the buildings,
guard-houses, torture rooms, the Picili Furnace and the other
structures. Upon entering the camp, the liberators found only ruins,
soot, smoke, and dead bodies.
XI THE INVESTIGATION OF THE USTASHA CRIMES IN JASENOVAC IN 1945
It
is difficult to establish the number of victims killed in the Jasenovac
concentration camp, since many documents were destroyed. The prisoners'
files were destroyed twice (at the beginning of 1943 and in April,
1945) and even if they had been preserved, they would have been of
little help discerning the truth, because the Ustasha often killed the
newly arrived prisoners immediately, without putting their names into
the files. This is particularly true of those who arrived from
Slavonia, Srem and Kozara, because it was only noted down that 9,830,
or 155 wagons had arrived. For instance, a very small number of Gypsies
was filed, only a few hundred, while it is known that all 25,000-35,000
of them from the NDH were killed in Jasenovac. The Jewish community in
Yugoslavia has established the number of 20,000 Jews that were killed
in Jasenovac. The numbers of killed Serbs are truly varied. The sources
from abroad mention numbers from 300,000 to 700,000. Be that as it may,
most of the people killed in Jasenovac were Serbs. Exact number being
still unknown, but it surely amounts to several hundreds of thousands.
The
National Committee of Croatia for the investigation of the crimes of
the occupation forces and their collaborators stated in its report of
November 15, 1945 that 500,000-600,000 people were killed at Jasenovac.
XII THE JASENOVAC MEMORIAL AREA
After
the end of the WWII, the burial of the victims and cleaning up of the
camp area were begun. The inhabitants of Jasenovac and the nearby
villages used the bricks and other building material in the
reconstruction and building of their houses. In that way, almost all
material evidence disappeared from the place of the biggest crime in
the former Yugoslavia, as if there had not been any camp in that place.
It seems that the state and the authorities of that time, especially
certain individuals in Zagreb, wanted it to be like that in Jasenovac.
Under the Brotherhood and Unity motto, with the aim of creating
tolerance between the nations, the crime had to be forgotten as soon as
possible.
It was only 20 years later, in 1965, under
pressure of the victims' families and relatives, that the building of a
monument was begun - a stone flower of which its author, engineer
Bogdan Bogdanovic, said that it suggests the idea of overcoming
suffering and insanity. A few years later, the Open Memorial Museum
was built, the graveyards were put in order, and the labor organization
named Jasenovac Memorial Park was formed, which functioned until the
beginning of the next war in 1991.
No matter how hard the
authors of the memorial Park tried, often stating that the memorial
complex would not resemble a city park or an artificial structure,
that is exactly what happened to it.
Looking at it from the
outside, Jasenovac Memorial Park, with its modern Museum building and
its stylized stone flower really resembled a nice park more than a
former concentration camp of the worst possible kind. If it had not
been for the obvious museum material and films, the visitor would have
hardly understood what had really happened there, or grasped all the
horrors. The authentic buildings were not preserved or renewed. The
monuments and the memorial plates were only inconspicuous marks of the
biggest execution places and the places of other camps which
constituted the Jasenovac complex of concentration camps, while some of
them, Bročice and Jablanac, were not even marked. In spite of that, the
site of the crime in Jasenovac was visited after the war by countless
numbers of relatives and friends, and since the memorial area has been
opened, hundreds of thousands of visitors have come who wished to pay
homage to the innocent victims.
XIII THE DESECRATION OF THE MEMORIAL AREA (1991)
(...)
At the end of September 1991 (beggining of civil wars in Tito's
Yugoslavia, ed. n.), the Croatian Army entered the Jasenovac memorial
park by force. According to the Hague Convention on the protection of
historical and cultural monuments, the Croatian Army severely broke the
agreement by entering the protected area. Although the international
public informed about desecration of the memorial park. there was not
much of a response.
The Serbian forces liberated Jasenovac
Memorial Park on October 8, 1991. During the withdrawal the Croatian
Army placed explosives (and) blew up the bridge on the Sava River which
connected the two parts of the Memorial Park; they also blew up the
graves, destroyed the Museum artifacts and stole the Museum equipment.
Due to the courage and enthusiasm of individuals who worked at the
Memorial Park, some historical materials and objects were saved. (After
the Dayton Agreement in 1995. Jasenovac Camps area became part of
Republic of Croatia, ed. n.)
This photo, taken by an individual not employed by
the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran shows an
Iranian police officer, center with white shirt, is protected and is
taken away by people after being beaten by protestors during
anti-government protest at the Enqelab (Revolution) St. in Tehran,
Iran, Sunday, Dec. 27, 2009. (AP Photo) EDITORS NOTE AS A RESULT OF AN
OFFICIAL IRANIAN GOVERNMENT BAN ON FOREIGN MEDIA COVERING SOME EVENTS
IN IRAN, THE AP WAS PREVENTED FROM INDEPENDENT ACCESS TO THIS EVENT
(Str - AP)
This photo, taken by an individual not employed by
the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran shows Iranian
protestors care the body of a man who allegedly was shot during
anti-government protest at the Enqelab (Revolution) St. in Tehran,
Iran, Sunday, Dec. 27, 2009. (AP Photo) EDITORS NOTE AS A RESULT OF AN
OFFICIAL IRANIAN GOVERNMENT BAN ON FOREIGN MEDIA COVERING SOME EVENTS
IN IRAN, THE AP WAS PREVENTED FROM INDEPENDENT ACCESS TO THIS EVENT
(Str - AP)
This photo, taken by an individual not employed by
the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran shows Iranian
protestors carry the body of a man who allegedly was shot during
anti-government protest at the Enqelab (Revolution) St. in Tehran,
Iran, Sunday, Dec. 27, 2009. (AP Photo) EDITORS NOTE AS A RESULT OF AN
OFFICIAL IRANIAN GOVERNMENT BAN ON FOREIGN MEDIA COVERING SOME EVENTS
IN IRAN, THE AP WAS PREVENTED FROM INDEPENDENT ACCESS TO THIS EVENT
(AP)
This photo, taken by an individual not employed by
the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran, shows a dead
body of a man who allegedly was shot during anti-government protest at
the Enqelab (Revolution) St. in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, Dec. 27, 2009.
(AP Photo) EDITORS NOTE: AS A RESULT OF AN OFFICIAL IRANIAN GOVERNMENT
BAN ON FOREIGN MEDIA COVERING SOME EVENTS IN IRAN, THE AP WAS PREVENTED
FROM INDEPENDENT ACCESS TO THIS EVENT.
(AP)
This photo, taken by an individual not employed by
the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran shows an
Iranian protestor throwing stone at anti-riot police officers, as their
bikes are set on fire by protestors, during anti-government protest at
the Enqelab (Revolution) St. in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, Dec. 27, 2009.
(AP Photo) EDITORS NOTE AS A RESULT OF AN OFFICIAL IRANIAN GOVERNMENT
BAN ON FOREIGN MEDIA COVERING SOME EVENTS IN IRAN, THE AP WAS PREVENTED
FROM INDEPENDENT ACCESS TO THIS EVENT
(Str - AP)
This photo, taken by an individual not employed by
the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran shows an
Iranian police officer, center with white shirt, is protected and is
taken away by people after being beaten by protestors during
anti-government protest at the Enqelab (Revolution) St. in Tehran,
Iran, Sunday, Dec. 27, 2009. (AP Photo) EDITORS NOTE AS A RESULT OF AN
OFFICIAL IRANIAN GOVERNMENT BAN ON FOREIGN MEDIA COVERING SOME EVENTS
IN IRAN, THE AP WAS PREVENTED FROM INDEPENDENT ACCESS TO THIS EVENT
(Str - AP)
This photo, taken by an individual not employed by
the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran shows Iranian
protestors beating police officers, during anti-government protest in
Tehran, Iran, Sunday, Dec. 27, 2009. (AP Photo) EDITORS NOTE AS A
RESULT OF AN OFFICIAL IRANIAN GOVERNMENT BAN ON FOREIGN MEDIA COVERING
SOME EVENTS IN IRAN, THE AP WAS PREVENTED FROM INDEPENDENT ACCESS TO
THIS EVENT
(Str - AP)
This photo, taken by an individual not employed by
the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran shows an
Iranian protestor flashing the victory sign during anti-government
protest at the Enqelab (Revolution) St. in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, Dec.
27, 2009. (AP Photo) EDITORS NOTE AS A RESULT OF AN OFFICIAL IRANIAN
GOVERNMENT BAN ON FOREIGN MEDIA COVERING SOME EVENTS IN IRAN, THE AP
WAS PREVENTED FROM INDEPENDENT ACCESS TO THIS EVENT
(Str - AP)
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 27, 2009; 2:57 PM
TEHRAN -- Security forces opened fire at crowds demonstrating against
the government in the capital on Sunday, killing at least five people,
including the nephew of opposition political leader Mir Hossein
Mousavi, witnesses and Web sites linked to the opposition said.
"Ali Mousavi, 32, was shot in the heart at the Enghelab square. He became a martyr," the Rah-e Sabz Website reported.
In the heaviest clashes in months, fierce battles erupted as tens of
thousands of demonstrators tried to gather on a main Tehran avenue,
with people setting up roadblocks and throwing stones at members of
special forces under the command of the Revolutionary Guard Corps. They
in turn threw dozens of teargas and stun grenades, but failed in
pushing back crowds, who shouted slogans against the government,
witnesses reported.
A witness reported seeing at least four people shot in the central
Vali-e Asr Square. "I saw a riot cop opening fire, using a handgun,"
the witness said. "A girl was hit in the shoulders, three other men in
their stomachs and legs. It was total chaos."
Fights were also reported in the cities of Isfahan and Najafabad in central Iran.
The protests coincided with Ashura, one of the most intense
religious holidays for Shiite Muslims. The slogans were mainly aimed at
the top leaders of the Islamic republic, a further sign that the
opposition movement against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's disputed
June election victory is turning against the leadership of the country.
At the Yadegar overpass, protesters shouted slogans such as "Death
to the dictator" and "long live Mousavi." They fought running battles
with security forces until a car filled with members of the
paramilitary Basij brigade drove at high speed though the makeshift
barriers of stones and sandbags that the protesters had erected.
About a dozen members of the Revolutionary Guards fired paintball
bullets, teargas and stun grenades. When reinforcements arrived, they
managed to push back the hundreds of protesters gathered at the
crossing.
Similar scenes could be seen at several crossings of the central
Azadi and Enghelab streets, witnesses reported. Large clouds of black
bellowing smoke rose up as people honked their cars in protests.
"This is a month of blood. The dictator will fall,"
people shouted, referring to the mourning month of Muharram. Young men
erected a flag symbolizing the struggle of the Shiite's third Imam
Hussein, whose death was commemorated Sunday.
On Saturday, security forces clad in black clashed with protesters
in northern Tehran after a speech by opposition leader and former
president Mohammad Khatami. After the police intervened, thousands of
protesters fanned out through the area.
The roads were clogged with cars, many honking their horns in
support of the protesters. About 50 armed government supporters
attacked a building used as an office by the household of the late
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, founder of the Islamic republic, according
to witnesses and the Parlemannews Web site, which is critical of the
government.
"There are so many people on the streets, I am amazed," a member of
the riot police said to his colleagues as he rested on his motorcycle
in a north Tehran square. Two women in traditional black chadors
flashed victory signs to passing cars, egging them on to honk in
support of the opposition.
Earlier, hundreds of police officers supported by dozens of members
of the elite Revolutionary Guard Corps and the paramilitary Basij force
clashed with small groups of protesters along Enghelab (Revolution)
Street, one of the capital's main thoroughfares, at times beating
people in an effort to disperse them.
The protests, which followed anti-government demonstrations in other
Iranian cities in recent days, come as Iran observes the 10 days of
Muharram, a mourning period for Imam Hussein, the Shiite saint whose
death in the 7th century sealed the rift between Sunni and Shiite
Muslims over the succession of the prophet Muhammad. On Sunday, Shiites
worldwide commemorate the day of his death during Ashura.
Special Correspondent Kay Armin Serjoie contributed to this report.
een man met een stem als een verkouden nachtegaal en minstens even indrukwekkend. Ook erg gepast als tegengif voor al het weemakend gekreun met belletjes op de achtergrond waarmee ze je op dit moment in elke winkelstraat om de oren slaan
BUNKER HILL
en als toemaatje krijg je er Link Wray als gitarist bij een geluid als een orkaan ...
Hallo, hier zijn we terug en zoals beloofd gaan we wat
jullie wat info geven over Pius XII en de rol van het Vaticaan tijdens
de tweede wereldoorlog in Yougoslavië. Want We gunnen Pius XII het
voordeel van de twijfel met Hitler en de jodenvervolging in Duitsland
en zelfs in de rest van Europa maar of we het zelfde kunnen zeggen van
wat er in Yougoslavië gebeurde laten we aan onze lezertjes over. Wij
vrezen dat we Pius XII hiervoor zijn zaligverklaring niet zouden gunnen
moesten we hierover iets te zeggen hebben en dat hebben we natuurlijk
niet. Maar de rol van het Vaticaan in dit dossier is meer dan dubieus
te noemen en het hoofd van het Vaticaan was toch onze zalige Pius XII
of zijn we verkeerd?
We beginnen bij de figuur van Ante Pavelic
waarvan we een degelijke biografie vonden op een website waar deze man
zeer terecht een ereplaats verdient. De site heet :
moreorless
: heroes & killers of the 20th century en om geen enkele twijfel te
laten ontstaan zeggen we er onmiddellijk bij dat hij een ereplaats heeft
bij de "killers" en zeker niet bij de "heroes" maar lees zelf maar. En reeds in deze biografie zullen jullie verwijzingen vinden naar banden met het Vaticaan...
www.moreorless.au.com
Ante Pavelic
AKA 'Butcher of the Balkans', AKA 'Poglavnik' (Chieftain), AKA Anton
Pavelitch, AKA Ante Pavelitch, AKA Pedro Gonner.
Country:
Croatia.
Kill tally:
300,000 to one million, including up to 30,000 Jews, up to 29,000 Gipsies, and
between 300,000 and 600,000 Serbs.
Background:
The southern Slavic states of Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia and Macedonia
begin to emerge as a unified state following the First World War. But
the legacy of a 400-year occupation by the Islamic Ottoman Empire and
traditional tension between Roman Catholics and Orthodox Christians frustrate
attempts for unity.
The pre-existing rifts are deepened during the Second World War when
varying ethnic and political groups use the cloak of the war to brutally
pursue rivalries.
Mini biography:
Born on 14 July 1889 in Bradina, about 35 km southwest of Sarajevo, the
capital of Bosnia-Herzegovina. He attends primary school at Travnik in
Bosnia-Herzegovina. After completing his secondary education at a Jesuit
seminary in Senj, Croatia, he studies law at the University of Zagreb.
Following his graduation he establishes a small law practice in Zagreb,
the capital of Croatia.
In his youth Pavelic joins the Croat Party of Rights (Hrvatska Stranka
Prava, HSP), an extreme, right-wing nationalist political group advocating
Croat separatism.
When the HSP breaks up in 1908 Pavelic joins a splinter faction lead
by Josip Frank. The faction, often called frankovci (frankist) after its
leader, considers itself to be the "pure" Party of Rights. Pavelic
is made interim secretary on 1 March 1919.
Pavelic believes in "a free and independent Croat state comprising
the entire historical and ethnic territory of the Croat people."
He believes that the enemies of the Croat liberation movement include
the Serbian Government, international Freemasonry, Jews, and communism.
1918 - The 'Kingdom of the Serbs,
Croats and Slovenes' is formed on 1 December and recognised by the Paris
Peace Conference in May 1919. The kingdom encompasses most of the Austrian
Slovenian lands, Croatia, Slavonia, most of Dalmatia, Serbia, Montenegro,
Vojvodina, Kosovo, the Serbian-controlled parts of Macedonia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina.
It is to be ruled by Serbian prince regent Aleksandar Karadjordjevicis.
As well as the ethnic Slav majority, the kingdom is home to Germans,
Albanians,
Hungarians, Romanians, Turks, Italians, Greeks, Czechoslovaks,
Slovaks, Ruthenians, Russians, Poles, Bulgars, Sephardic and Ashkenazic
Jews, and Gipsies. It includes people of the Christian Orthodox faith,
Roman Catholics, Muslims, Jews and Protestants.
The political mix of the kingdom reflects this multicultural base, with
no single party ever gaining a majority. The Serbian Radical Party (SRP),
lead by Nikola Pasic, and the Croatian Republican Peasant Party (CRPP),
lead by Stjepan Radic, dominate but hold almost diametrically opposed
views, with the Serbs advocating strong central control and the Croats
favouring regional autonomy.
1920 - Following a general election
where it wins the majority of Croatian seats, the CRPP boycotts the parliament,
a position it will maintain until 1924. The boycott allows the SRP to
take power by default and pursue its centralist policies.
1925 - The CRPP and SRP strike a compromise
and form a coalition government. Under the agreement the CRPP recognises
the monarchy, accepts the constitution and changes its name to the Croatian
Peasant Party (CPP). However, the coalition is shortlived, lasting only
until 1926, after which the parliament degenerates.
1927 - Pavelic is elected to the Zagreb
City Council as a representative for the frankovci faction of the HSP.
At national elections, the Croatian block that includes the frankovci
faction wins 45,000 votes in the Zagreb region and is allocated two seats
in the Yugoslav Parliament, one of which is given to Pavelic. He is later
elected vice president of the HSP-frankovci.
1928 - Radic is shot and mortally
wounded on the floor of parliament on 20 June. When he dies on 28 August
representatives from Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina walk out of the parliament,
demanding a federal state and refusing to acknowledge the authority of
the king.
1929 - On 6 January, in an attempt
to hold the federation together, the king suspends the constitution and
declares a temporary 'Royal Dictatorship'. The parliament is dissolved,
political parties are banned, civil liberties are cancelled, local self-government
is abolished and laws are decreed against sedition, terrorism, and propagation
of communism. A Serb is made premier, and the name of the country is officially
changed to the 'Kingdom of Yugoslavia'.
However, it is soon evident that rather than cementing unity the king's
plan is creating greater division. Croatian opposition to a Serb-controlled
centralist system grows, while the Serbian political movement is fractured.
Leaders of both groups flee the country, as does Pavelic, who is sentenced
to death in absentia for his part in anti-Serb demonstrations organised
by Bulgarian and Macedonian terrorists.
Pavelic travels to Vienna, the capital of Austria, arriving in February.
While in the city he takes the leadership of the Croat Youth Movement,
a nationalist group dedicated to resisting the royal dictatorship. Pavelic
also makes contact with the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation
(VRMO), whose leader provides him with an introduction to Benito Mussolini, the
fascist dictator of Italy.
1931 - The royal dictatorship in Yugoslavia
is ended and limited democracy reintroduced, although the political landscape
remains tumultuous and divisive. Croatian discontent builds when the new
leader of the CPP is arrested and jailed for terrorist activities.
1932 - Pavelic accepts an offer from
Mussolini to relocate to Italy, where be begins to refashion the Croat
Youth Movement into the terrorist group that will come to be known as
the Ustase (Insurrection).
Provisioned with training camps, protection and financial support by
Mussolini, and receiving further support from the government of Hungry
and, later, from Nazi
Germany, the Ustase begin a campaign of bombings within Yugoslavia.
In the so-called 'Lika Uprising' the Ustase attempt an armed invasion
of Yugoslavia. About one dozen Ustase operatives covertly cross the Adriatic
in motorboats, travelling from Italy to Zadar on the Croatian coast, which
is then under Italian rule. From Zadar they travel overland to the Velebit
Mountains. After attacking a police station and killing 17 police they
are forced into a hasty retreat with a number of local Ustase who joined
them during the action.
The base for Ustase terrorist operations then moves to
Hungary.
1934 - On 14 October a Ustase agent
assassinates King Aleksandar while he is visiting Marseille in France.
Pavelic is thought to have bribed a high French official to ensure that
security around the king was lax, even though the Ustase had made a previous
attempt on his life.
Following the assassination, a three-man regency is appointed to rule
in the king's place. The CPP leader is released from jail and, in 1935,
elections are held. The resulting government eases political oppression
but fails to restore full democracy or to address the Croatian separatist
movement, which refuses to compromise.
Italy, meanwhile, arrests Pavelic and other leaders of the Ustase following
the assassination of the king but refuses to extradite them to face the
death sentences passed in absentia in France. Several months later they
are released.
1939 - On 26 August, with the outbreak
of the Second World War imminent, the Yugoslav Government signs an agreement,
the 'Sporazum' (Understanding), with the CPP granting limited autonomy
to Croatia. Six days later Germany invades Poland and the war begins.
Yugoslavia attempts to remain neutral but comes under mounting pressure
from Germany to fall in with the other Balkan states and sign the 'Tripartite
Pact', aligning the country with the 'Axis' powers - Germany, Italy and
Japan.
1941 - The Yugoslav Government gives
into the German pressure on 24 March, signing a protocol of adherence
to the Tripartite Pact. Two days later, on 26 March, junior officers from
the Yugoslav air force stage a coup d'état and overthrow the government,
unleashing a wave of anti-German demonstrations across Belgrade, the national
capital. Germany responds on 6 April, bombing the capital in a 'blitzkrieg'
(lightning war) that kills thousands (sources estimate the number killed to
be between 12,000 and 17,000). Axis forces then invade.
Pavelic seizes the opportunity. Broadcasting from Italy, he calls on
Croatian soldiers to mutiny. "Use your weapons against the Serbian
soldiers and officers," he says, "We are fighting shoulder to
shoulder with our German and Italian allies."
Overwhelmed by the Axis invasion force, the Yugoslav Army collapses and
the government flees.
On 10 April German troops occupy Zagreb. The same day, Slavko Kvaternik,
a retired Austro-Hungarian colonel who is the Ustase leader in Croatia,
Pavelic's deputy, and commander of the armed forces, proclaims the 'Independent
State of Croatia' (Nezavisna Drzava Hrvatska, NDH), which incorporates
Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Syrmia.
Pavelic arrives in Zagreb at 5 a.m. on Tuesday 15 April, ending his
12 years of exile.
By 17 April all Yugoslav resistance to the Axis forces has been crushed.
On 18 April the Yugoslav Army officially surrenders. The invaders now
begin to carve up the spoils.
The Germans recognise the NDH, occupy most of Serbia and annex northern
Slovenia. Italy takes southern Slovenia, and much of Dalmatia, joins Kosovo
with its Albanian puppet state, and occupies Montenegro. Hungary occupies
part of Vojvodina and Slovenian and Croatian border regions. Bulgaria
takes Macedonia and a part of southern Serbia.
On the urging of Mussolini, the Germans agree to make Pavelic Poglavnik
(Chieftain) of the NDH. Almost immediately he declares that the primary
aim of his government will be the "purification" of Croatia
and the elimination of "alien elements." The "ethnic cleansing"
of two million Serbs, Jews, and Gipsies in the NDH now begins.
Pavelic's Ustase storm troopers employ forced religious conversion, deportation
and murder to achieve their goal of an ethnically pure Croatia. Their
credo is "kill a third, expel a third, and convert a third."
Serbs will be required to wear armbands bearing the letter P (for Pravoslavac,
or Orthodox Christian), while Jews will have to wear armbands with the
letter Z (for Zidov).
The Ustase will be supported by elements of the Croatian Catholic Church,
including the Archbishop of Sarajevo, Ivan Saric. Some Franciscan priests
will enlist in the Ustase and participate in the violence.
The massacres begin at the Serbian village of Gudovac in Bosnia-Herzegovina
on 27 April. They will continue unabated until the end of the war and
result in the genocide of tens of thousands of Serbs, Jews and Gipsies.
Thousands more will flee to the relative safety of Serbia. Orthodox priests
will also be targeted, with 131 out of the total of 577 practicing in
the region being killed. Execution methods favoured by the Ustase included
knifing and bludgeoning to death, throwing live victims from cliffs, as
well as shooting.
The brutality of the Ustase violence of appals many high-ranking officers
in the occupying forces. General Edmund Glaise von Horstenau, the German
commander of the NDH, reports to Berlin that "according to reliable
reports from countless German military and civilian observers ... the
Ustasha have gone raging mad." Later he states that the "Croat
revolution was by far the bloodiest and most awful among all I have seen
firsthand or from afar in Europe since 1917."
The German commander of southeastern Europe calls the Ustase onslaught
"a Croatian crusade of destruction." Italian commanders begin
to provide civilians with protection against the Ustase, with some going
so far as to ignore orders to cease the practice.
On 6 June Pavelic meets German dictator Adolf Hitler, who agrees
to Pavelic's plan to expel much of the Serbian population of the NDH and
replace them with Croats and Slovenes from lands annexed by the Germans.
Pavelic will meet with Hitler again in November 1942.
In September 1941 an Ustase-run concentration camp is opened at Jasenovac,
on the Bosnia-Herzegovina border about 90 km southeast of Zagreb. Up to
200,000 Serbs, Jews, Gipsies and political prisoners are killed at Jasenovac,
which is the largest in the 26 camps established in the Balkans. Along
with the Ustase, Catholic clergy staff the camp and participate in the
executions.
Meanwhile, the Yugoslav resistance movement begins to coalesce around
the nationalist 'Chetnik' groups and the communist-led 'Partisan' guerrillas.
Yugoslav Army Colonel Dragoljub 'Draza' Mihailovic becomes the best know
of the Chetnik commanders, and in October 1941 is recognised by Britain
as the leader of the Yugoslav resistance movement. In 1942 the Yugoslav
government-in-exile promotes him to commander of its armed forces. Mihailovic's
strategy is to avoid clashes with Axis forces and prepare for a general
uprising to coincide with an invasion of the Balkans by the Allied forces
of Britain, the United States and the Soviet Union.
Josip Broz Tito, the secretary-general of the Yugoslavian Communist Party,
leads the Partisans. Their slogan is "Death to Fascism, Freedom to
the People." Tito favours direct action, and in July 1941 launches
uprisings that win the Partisans control of much of the Yugoslav countryside.
However, thousands of civilians are killed in Ustase reprisals.
In September 1941 Germany also hits back, warning that 100 Serb civilians
will be executed for every German soldier killed by the resistance. In
October about 7,000 Serbian men and boys are executed at Kragujevac in
Serbia after a squadron of Germans is wiped out in an ambush. A further
1,700 are executed at Kraljevo.
Tito ignores the reprisals and continues with the Partisans' campaign,
extending their attacks to the Chetnik forces, which are largely anti-communist.
Mihailovic in turn targets the Partisans as the main enemy of the Chetniks.
The Chetniks also begin to cooperate with the Germans and Italians to
prevent a communist victory.
1942 - On 16 April Pavelic announces
that a scorched earth policy will be used to combat the resistance. Under
the policy, anyone in those regions of the NDH subject to resistance activity
can be summarily executed.
1943 - In December British Prime Minister
Winston
Churchill, US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt,
and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin agree to give
their full support to the Partisans, effectively marginalising the Chetniks.
The Partisans' position is further strengthened in September 1944 when
the exiled king calls on all Yugoslavs to back them.
1944 - The advancing Soviet Army crosses
the Yugoslav border on 1 October, joining with the Partisans to liberate
Belgrade on 20 October. The Red Army then moves on toward Germany, leaving
the Partisans and the Western Allies to mop up the remaining Germans,
Ustase, and Chetniks. The bloodiest fighting breaks out when the Partisans
advance into Croatia.
1945 - The Partisans capture Sarajevo
on 6 April. Ustase leaders and collaborators flee to Austria, along with
regular Croatian and Slovenian troops and some Chetniks, leaving the Partisans
in control of all of Yugoslavia.
On 7 May Germany surrenders unconditionally. The war in Yugoslavia ends
on 15 May. It has claimed between one million and 1.7 million Yugoslav lives,
or up to 11% of the pre-war population. The majority of the dead have been
killed by their fellow countrymen.
The Ustase is estimated to have murdered up to 30,000 Jews, up to 29,000
Gipsies, and between 300,000 and 600,000 Serbs.
The Partisans are estimated to have killed up to 300,000 Croat refugees turned
back from Austria at the start of May. The massacre of the Croats takes place near
the Austrian border village of Bleiburg and during the so-called 'Way of the Cross'
death marches back to Croatia that follow.
Pavelic evades the Partisans. Fleeing Zagreb on 15 April, he travels overland
to Austria, and then on to Rome. He is reported to be living in the city under
the protection of the Catholic Church and with the knowledge of the Allied
occupational forces, who fail to arrest him even though they are provided with
credible information on his whereabouts.
On 12 September 1947 the American Counterintelligence Corps office in
Roman reports that "Pavelic's contacts are so high, and his present
position is so compromising to the Vatican, that any extradition of Subject
would deal a staggering blow to the Roman Catholic Church."
Early in 1948 Pavelic moves to a monastery near Castel Gandolfo, 25 km
southeast of Rome, where he lives disguised as a priest. Later the same
year Vatican operatives smuggle him to Buenos Aires in Argentina, where
he revives the Ustase movement (now called Hrvatska Drzavotvorna Stranka)
and acts as a security adviser to Argentine President Juan Perón.
About 7,250 other members of the Ustase find refuge in Argentina between
1946 and 1948.
Meanwhile in Yugoslavia, the communists, backed by the Soviet Union,
take control of the government. The Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia
is proclaimed on 29 November. It comprises the republics of Slovenia,
Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia. An ethnically
mixed Autonomous Province of Vojvodina and a mostly Albanian Autonomous
Region of Kosovo are created within Serbia. Tito heads the Communist Party,
the government and the armed forces.
Retribution against wartime collaborators begins. Ustase members, Croatian
and Slovenian collaborators and innocent refugees who had fled to Austria
are captured and returned to Yugoslavia, where thousands are summarily
executed by the Partisans. Thousands of Chetniks are jailed. Mihailovic
and other Chetnik leaders are executed for collaboration after a show
trial in 1946.
Over 200 priests and nuns charged with participating in Ustase atrocities
are also executed.
In September 1946 the head of the Croatian Catholic Church, Archbishop
Alojzije Stepinac, is sentenced to 16 years jail for complicity with the
Pavelic government. He serves five years before begin released.
1957 - The Yugoslav secret police
catch up with Pavelic in Argentina, organising an assassination attempt
that is implemented on 9 April. Pavelic survives but is badly wounded.
He subsequently flees to Spain, which is ruled by the fascist dictator
Francisco
Franco.
1959 - Pavelic dies in Madrid on 28
December from injuries sustained in the assassination attempt. It is
later revealed that his body is secured at a secret location in Madrid
waiting for the time when it can be returned to the "homeland"
to lie in state in Zagreb.
Postscript
1999 - Former Chetnik Blagoje Jovovic
claims that it was he who fired the shots that eventually led to the death
of Pavelic. Jovovic, originally from Montenegro, had emigrated to Argentina
following the war.
2003 - Croatia and Serbia-Montenegro
move towards reconciliation on 10 September when the presidents of both
countries apologise to one another for "all the evils" done
by their countries in wars. In an earlier trip to Israel the Croatian
president had apologised for crimes committed by the Ustase during the
Second World War.
Comment:
The horror of events in the Balkans during the Second World War has been
displaced in recent memory by further horrors committed there at the end
of the century. But it could be argued that the genocide allegedly committed
by the likes of Slobodan Milosevic
and Radovan Karadzic pales
in comparison to that of Ante Pavelic and his fascist regime. One thing
is certain - the suffering of the Serbs at the hands of the Ustase during
the Second World War was and continues to be a key factor in the paranoia
that informs much of their national chauvinism.
And there is legitimate cause for their concern. Pavelic has gone but
the Ustase lives on. Since Pavelic's death, the movement has been implicated
in numerous terrorist attacks in Europe and the United States. Between
1962 and 1966, three Yugoslav diplomats were murdered by the Ustase. In
1968 a bombing attack on a theatre in Belgrade killed one person and wounded
85. The Yugoslav ambassador to Sweden was assassinated in Stockholm in
1971. The following year Ustase terrorists hijacked a Swedish airliner
and successfully demanded that the ambassador's assassin be freed. The
Ustase also claimed responsibility for the bombing of a Yugoslav JAT airliner
flying from Denmark to Croatia in 1972. The attack killed 26.
An explosion in a storage locker at New York's La Guardia airport in
December 1975 that killed 11 people and injured 75 may have been set by
the Ustase. In September 1976 four Ustase agents hijacked an American
TWA plane, resulting in the death of one police officer. The same year
the Yugoslav embassy in Washington was bombed. In 1980 the Ustase detonated
a bomb in the Statue of Liberty in New York.
More worrying still, there are many within contemporary Croatia who continue
to view Pavelic as a national hero and long for a time when his goal of
an ethnically pure "homeland" is finally realised. The founding
of the NDH on 10 April 1941 is still openly commemorated in parts of the
country, and renegade priests still give eulogies to Pavelic.