The least that one can ask is a respect for the philosophy of another, especially when they do not preach violence or present a threat.

Islam is a religion that condemned the violence, but the fact that a philosophy or religious fanatics abuse to violence as alleged defense to argue should not lead others to the underlying doctrines to deface or ridicule.

In Islam, violence as self-defenses are not only approved but even encouraged, but self-defense is inherent in the nature and urge to survive. It is not because the Christian doctrine opposition to renounce violence, as in the conception "if they hit your one cheek offer then other" what the totalitarian tolerance reflected in the Christian doctrine is contained. However, such a doctrine is contrary to the nature and creation and is good for poor people as docile cattle to treat to make them endlessly to exploit. Secondly, it is just the Christian world through that the ages is intolerable and violent to others believers, while their members believe behalf god to judge.

One may the fact that extremism only fed by violence and oppression not lose sight, yet the fact that Western society in the development of Islam these contested has, through crusades, under pretext of necessity to the Holy Land and specifically the city of Jerusalem, protecting Muslims occupation.

That Christianity and the underlying philosophies people to laugh is therefore not surprising, but it is remarkable that from the Islamic world never attacks focus on the philosophy and doctrines of Christianity. We Christians focus however openly our arrows without any restraint on anything not consistent with our beliefs, and show no respect for religion or belief of others.

One should not lose sight of the fact that mock people, their behavior or belief in facts gives the effect of bullying, or moral and psychological abuse, which is not only reprehensible but in several western countries also punishable. Such actions the expression of free opinion classification is just a bridge too far, since this leads to the freedom to anyone under any circumstances to mock or moral and psychological attack. If such expressions not as harassment or aggression mean, it would be at least apologize to offer. On the other hand it is also true that extremists quickly every blunder of opponents will seize them to accuse and attack. Such attacks may be best to disprove without any counterattack but an assertive attitude and apology, by which way one the power of this alleged weapon deprives.

Islam is presented as a religion that oppressed women, but this phenomenon is really bad in the Arab world, while the area only a minority of the followers of Mohammed represented. Under the black peoples in Africa, we find societies in which the Muslim woman a premium positioning has and often enjoy more rights as her husband.

One should know that the majority of Muslims in our society are present, little or no recognizable by costume or use in public. The widely controversial headscarf emerges only massively where such use fighting or contesting, while simultaneously many Muslim women ultimately from pure resistance also take back into use. Migrants of the first generation have always been intertwined with morals and customs of their roots and can often not suddenly in another world and use full integrate, mainly through their clothes in public notice. We too can hardly or not the clothing habits and manners in public of an area where we migrate to take over.

Religions, faith and morals are elements that arise from the general development of a region, and thus consistent with the development and needs of nature and man. Many of the foundations of faith and morals we unconsciously carry over to posterity, itself partly through the DNA.