Someone who wants to organize an administration begins with the selection of his or her employees, and they select these employees for their intelligence and ability. The assessment of the competence of the staff, however, assessed in relation to the insight and intelligence of the assessor, with the result that the competence of the staff as a reference may be to intelligence of the manager. What the own capacity and intelligence approached is approved, what far above lies is seen as incomprehensible and foolish, but all things below the own intelligence is rejected and considered stupid, incompetent or unfit.

The invisible torture, "Bullying"!

Bullying consists of the constant verbal or physical stalking of persons without compelling reason or need for self defense. Bullying is only prevalent in the western and individualistic society, and is only a morbid tendency of persons who are not in a socially acceptable manner profiling or maintain. The culprits are those who have a lack of social intelligence, and are very strongly represented in the western individualistic development.

Belgium is overwhelmed by laws and steps while resulting in only a rising crime and disorder may determine. Harassment and violence against others was in KB of 2002 recorded by the Belgian government as a recognized form of Psychological violence. However, it is clear that with the tap open mop. The problem for Belgium is that the government can take any real steps without themselves at risk to come. The federal government massively guilty to harassment of opponents, and shun no means opponents to curtail.

In the eighties of the last century the Flemish party, "VB" (VlaamsBlok) as extreme named and then by the Government with the support of Socialists, Liberals, Christian Democrats and Greens, by way of a "cordon sanitary" of political participation excluded, an action that only resulted in increasing popularity of the party that only a democratic reflection was of what in the people lived.

The emergence of the new Flemish party, NV-A, which gave a moderate reflection by less extreme and more structured Flemish sigh away for approaching, and with it all the layers and ideologies of the Flemish population touching. Also this party encounters a massive and well-coordinated opposition from the government and the same political family, to include such party shall be excluded. This shows that the constant factor underlying coordinate care, outside of politics is, and can be found in the Belgian Royal House. It is striking that all departments are obliged to cooperate, and one gets no scruples about to openly obstructive judges to threaten or to avenge. One can therefore safely ask whether there is a difference between harassment and such illegal or undemocratic practices.

The target justifies the means, and in this (Christian) perspective they seem to justify this. A fervent opponent's his legal rights through illegal manipulations depriving also belong to one of the practices used to get individual people to the extreme bullying. They are not afraid to judges to oblige all the rights of the victims to ignore. The appointment of a temporary and alternate judge is one of the means to a judge to get that to the tune of governments will dances, against the law and the current agreements. Illegality and forgery are rife with the Belgian authorities and every newcomer should willingly or unwillingly along in the same harness, does he or she in his or her office or mandate be tolerated. One can again ask whether there is a difference between such practices and awareness bullying.

The result of such practices is that one can't otherwise as politically appoint, to maintain such a system. Such appointments shall the qualifications of nominees brush aside and create a team which by lack of skill name will make through the most bizarre actions and laws. To excess such appointments erode out the position of state secretariats, by politically appointed bunglers occupied.

Let's take an example, such as the safety of motorcyclists on the road. The riding gear mandatory from September 2011 makes no sense. This law shows not only the fact that the law by a layman in matters has been elaborated, but also proves that the author did not bother or mind had an expert opinion.

Required protective clothing for motorcyclists

1) To protect the hands, the use of gloves is mandatory. There are no specific requirements concerning the implementation or materials used.

2) To optimize the legs to protect the rider wears long pants. Here are also no detailed description or further information, and here also the question arise from which materials would similar pants be made.

3) In order to protect feet and ankles, the motorcyclist boots or footwear till over the ankles, wearing. Same question here, what material they should be, and therefore complying rubber boots?

4) Finally, the mandatory motorcycle helmet to wear. An issue that leaves no doubt.

The prescribed safety clothing has only effect in the use of sport, super sport or racing bikes on a racetrack or on a one-direction way as on a motorway, or a sports circuit and only if the clothing of leather are, seen one with a leather dress at a crash abrasions can prevent. The danger for the motorcyclists is to collide with objects or oncoming traffic, but then the clothes not give protection. Accidents involving motorcycles happen mostly with speed or sport bikes, not touring bikes, shoppers or motor scooters, since the acceleration of speed motors where inflated is that one can easily control over the vehicle can lose, with all its consequences.

The same law is a plague for most motorcycle enthusiasts who the motorbike for their free time, which usually consists of touring on summer days and weekends, often in a motor association, but the rider sits or unprotected possibly in full sun, well packed to the new standards, at a moderate speed and stewing in its own fat.

The same law allows motorcyclists to deal with motors up to 125cc children from 3 years is secured with a seat which such opportunity is often used for short distances children to school to bring and to pick. For such a short ride that normally goes through country roads and in built-up centers, where at most 30 to 50 km / h, as maximum speed is permitted, the child must be encased follow the new dress standards for motorbikes, high shoes or boots included, even when more than 25° Celsius shadow temperature and speeds up to maximum 30, 50 or 70km/h.

The same law requires the rider the use of high shoes or boots to protect the ankles and long pants to protect the legs, but this also applies to motor scooters, while the rider his or her feet and legs within the framework of the vehicle exists, and the lower limbs hardly vulnerable.

Did we mention bullying, or trap it there not?

It is striking that the legislator makes no distinction between different types of motorcycles, and touring motors, shoppers, motor scooters, sports motors, super sport motors and racing motors equates to the same standards.

Also remarkable is the fact that also ridden terrain or road does not lead to any discrimination and use the same demands for urban and small roads with a maximum of 30 to 70km/uur as for main road and highway traffic with higher speed facilities.

The safety of motorcycles can increase by a speed limit on the road to oblige for sport, super sport and race motors or by the authorized capacity reduction, but also by touring motors and shopper from 100cc to oblige Fall/protection guard to assemble, except scooters course. Fall protectors systems have the advantage that in a crash the motorcyclist not with the legs or feet is squeezed under the own vehicle while he or she incurs little or no abrasions. The competent State Secretary is obviously not wise enough to see that an expert for research with the participation of stakeholders as motorcyclists, producers and instructors an acceptable and responsible outcome would have offered, instead of a law of which offer from not any side the road safety for motorcyclists and other road users improved, but the users just as annoying and useless experience.

Did we mention bullying? And what about this case?

Thanks to unconditional collegiality within the circle of representatives of successive governments and their supporters, are abuses, blunders and dirty or shady business practices of mandataries or their subordinates collectively swept under the carpet, regardless of the consequences or impact on society or the individual. Collegiality which maintain intact through consecutive legislatures can only be guaranteed, if an underlying coordination is not politically bound and is not subject to the influence or participation of the people, but nevertheless a power at the highest level, or it may affect. The latter remains for Belgium only choose between mafia or monarchy.

The absolutely undemocratic course of successive governments is only possible by an underlying influence at national level which is not politically bound. Abuses at the national and federal level of government at every change of government keep stand, while nobody really serious investigations into the underlying causes knows to come, leads us to the question of whether investigations and actions can or may take, without private involvement to release. Should be no thorough investigations carried out into underlying causes of gang activity or files around the gang of Nivelles, before all traces are erased? Also possible to investigate an underlying organization of the actions of Marc Dutroux will or may apparently never intensely execute.

Abuses in the asylum and presumably intentional tampering work of former leaders such as Annemie Turtelboom (Open VLD), Melchior Wathelet yr (CDH) Maggie De Block (Open VLD), and the services for migration and asylum, supported by disinformation, forgery and statements etc. with appalling consequences for victims, can't be sued, as addressed prosecutors not occur and only judges involved are those willing to be in league with the wolves in the forest. Resistance of victims leads only to a game of cat and mouse, and the victims will send one as in the Dutroux case, from pillar to post.

The thorough manner, in which atrocities and exporters are shielded, indirectly proves an underlying organization which presupposes that this organization is frequently addressed. Solid organization and protection of malpractice should not disposable, so we may assume that it is a common but well hidden ailment concerns that democracy and community in Belgium affects, and can't be an exception.

Had we not talking about bullying and what will the government now act against their own bestiality, monstrous practices and the protection of perpetrators responsible for atrocities, rapes and serial killings? I don’t think so, given severe actions of the authorities on their own heads could end. Thorough approach to bullying should not be too thorough and governments should be safeguarded. Thorough steps are therefore certainly not, but will first be put off for later forgotten.

The problem is not just that we have more bungler than ministers in the Belgian federal government count, but political appointments ensure that their entourage and underlying support through their state secretariats, also staffed with political friends of a similar alloy and level as their bosses.