We may wonder whether it would be better to introduce the death penalty back to the proliferation of crime under control.

It is doubtful whether there is sufficient political will for such a proposal to rise, given the highest degree of irresponsible violations of human rights primarily in political circles quote.

For Belgium, the death penalty we certainly part of the unhealthy royal house to redeem the good example of the Russian solution of the Czarist regime. One should remember that the eradication of crime in government circles, the only way to a decent combat of crime in general, and combating of crime under a state criminal regime only mop with open valve signify.

However, one must be consistent and remember that in Belgium the drastic action against the crime, meaning that with the removal of the roots and bases, or the monarchy, the leaders of major parties that the monarchy league must prosecute and condemn for their people betrayal and the imbecile way they misuse the trust of the people.

Several leading members of the major political parties supporting latent in the laxity of action against crime, allowing themselves full profiling as protégés of such criminals and their activities, the Dutroux case in mind and zeal that one does to discharge his accessories which only as a sign of next discharge of Dutroux himself may be seen. One can however imagine that the customers of such criminals are the only ones affected by the release of criminals in order to prevent offenders or performing them as their instructor would indicate.

The Belgian monarch, Albert II mediated in forming a government of 2010, with the result that the Flemish majority side was pushed and compromises were required between 4 French and 4 Dutch-speaking parties, which result in a government formation with a record duration of 541 days or almost 1.5 years. Through this political maneuver was against all democratic norms in the Flemish majority in the new government, with support from the monarch and the losing parties, under-represented.

To excess the government parties ignore with the tacit consent of the king their own laws and limits of all humanity to be extremely serious criminals to indemnify and hold opponents to silence.

The instability which came, however, at the hands of the monarch Albert II, has an additional adverse effect and prevent the forces of mass and democracy to drastically and urgently needed reforms to fulfill. The protection from extreme criminals such as co-perpetrators of Dutroux, is increased to a peak and crime in government circles by the unconditional solidarity, which may be required of the government members, however, secretly protected.

Nobody and certainly no government can in a country with a democratic electoral system, openly and with impunity, irrefutable crime shelter. Even the biggest idiot should understand that this will result in a negative reaction from voters who feel threatened by rising crime, and in their voting behavior the politicians who they deem responsible, will punish. The question of who these politicians have been bribed to be justified, or should we assume that their IQ is even worse than that of an idiot.

That the Belgian monarch Albert II is not innocent to the unusual state of affairs can’t be denied, but here the question arises what this monarchy with the protection of the toughest crime of the past century, namely the activities of the gang of Nivelles and of Dutroux, has to do. It is of course everyone noticed that the gentlemen prosecutors, originally by their title as representative of royal authority were considered judicial supervision to keep, without opposition from the monarch or his services, their name and authority abused by confusion in the current investigations into these criminalities to provoke, and so the reputation of the monarchy and monarch himself brought into question.

The fact that even the biggest fool other way’s can assume then that these criminals at the top of society were protected which justified the suspicion that their potential principals in this area can be found. The gruesome mass illegalities and violations of democratic rules and laws and the lack of function of law and justice support the presumption that this is intentional is maintained, and the civilians on rights only can count if it suits the authorities.

The overt and written confirmation and protection of misdeeds and forgery of the Immigration Department, asylum and migration, by the new Secretary Maggie De Block stresses quite in the same direction, while the collegiality among government officials any action against abusive practices from outside, in the bud smothers. Collegiality is by the government required, with the excuse that this is the cooperation of government officials must ensure, but it also excludes judicial vetoes within the government out, leaving only the crime benefits can be and the citizen can ask where the difference is located between the Belgian government and a mafia organization?

It should be clear to everyone that any party fails wishes or determine the ending of this, whether the continued participation of the monarchy tolerated, the support of the people, the self-employed entrepreneur or industrialist do not deserve, while only the chaos and lawlessness be served, not the people, the future of the industrial viability of the region.

The power struggle between monarchy or dictatorship in a supposed democratic society and not only has adverse impact on the affected area, but also to all connected regions or companies of any federation with which the society is affiliated.

The entire European Union is thus subject by mutual commitment to the struggle and instabilities of its member countries.