That Marc Dutroux and his associates has been benefit of an exceptional protection is an open secret and has no doubt. The continuity of the protection from the authorities and the actions to be accomplices in conditional freedom to set be amazing and does rise for many questions.

Who has a benefit and interest in that investigation into the activities of Nivelles gang are sabotaged or the fact that the activities and backgrounds of Dutroux not be figured out, certainly not by the media. Only the clients or stakeholders, belonging to higher authorities are not only interested but are possibly also in a position to prevent or upsetting every investigation. It is clear that investigations into the gang of Nivelles out of hand walked through the agency of Messrs. Attorneys of the King while investigations into the disappearances of girls and children led not to the already known Marc Dutroux. It is legally blundered in cases where a child may determine that such blunders especially by deliberate failure could emerge.

The assumption that such blunders deliberately created were, leads us to the question of who is responsible or who hereby interests has. Of course, only the persons involved will prevent that perpetrators open their mouths and fear of leaks will have. That therefore involved authority concerned or principals in high positions must be found is more than clear, especially given the efforts by successive governments and parties to the crime by their passive attitude free from persecution or serious penalties must set.

The three major political parties belonging to the regular government occupation or were included, however, not certain power continuity and protection linked to criminal organizations or perpetrators has or could assure. From this angle, the crime so never absolutely ensured, allowing senior clients or those persons have recourse or belonging to a person or institution, that had a continuity in power represented and not the politics or the voting behavior of the population is subject. But even this meets only when that power is large enough to determine with certainty the policy and justice to such a force or person to submit. Unless a mafia organization that probably temporarily may be able, but its illegality no continuity to ensure but there is only one person who can qualify and that such a position invariably by law holds, which in a democracy through popular participation fundamentally excluded is, and can only in a dictatorial system or in an absolute monarchy. Such person for Belgium is none other than Albert II, King of Belgium, who despite the fact that Belgium is a democracy ought to be, yet a executive king with proved full participation and more than enough proves a indecent and undemocratic power to develop and majority parties who are not royalist drafted, managed to exclude.

The tenacity with which government parties promote the release of extremely serious criminals and continuity that this, regardless of the parties participating in the government, and against the popular resistance and any logic, remains intact, justifies more than the idea that there is no political bound but absolutely prevailing power behind it, making all except the monarch, Albert II be ruled out. The absolute and clearly orchestrated opposition against the political right wing and against the Royal family finally pointed in the direction of the Belgian monarchy and its monarch, Albert II. The repeated allegations that Prince Albert in the period of Pink ballets by victims as X1, X2, X3 and X4, as a participant was identified, which was never proven, despite everything calls a lot of questions. It was never proved or one does not might proves or confirm, we can only guess. Sex parties own on the western individualistic development, were and are worldwide by Western individuals from higher circles frequently used for various purposes, which of course in such phenomena as blackmail seems as a very useful weapon.

Given the developments of the government formation of 2010 and the undemocratic opposition emerging rightist politics with politic cordon sanitaria around the former “VlaamsBlok” and a new attempt a political cordon around NV.A to raise, make a presumption against the monarchy more than justified. It will create a presumption against the Monarch only stronger to come forward and here arise the question whether Albert II and his entourage or friends be clients or they involved in serious criminal activities, psychopathic and sadistic violence against defenseless and children are. This presumption is only stronger and more credible if one considers that first Christian Democrats stand up for the protection of criminals and unconditional access for immigrants with an associated "Quick Belgian right" and fail current justice, giving them a beating of the people brings. This system is, however, almost unchanged passed to Open VLD who persecute by Annemie Turtelboom both Justice and migration further fraudulent and fundamentally unchanged continue and crime through covert criminal activities of the own occupation maintains, what a continuity from outside and above the legal powers to maintain this unconditionally collegiality required.

Some scarce and especially deceptive adjustments and promises adaptable to people's whishes has to appease the public anger.

The fact that defenseless and children through the services of foreign affairs on a rough way and beastly morally abused, by committing frequent forgery, harassment from craving for power which not infrequently to suicide of those victims lead, be to the bargain assisted by ombudsmen in government who on its turn these forgeries certify. This phenomenon refers to a widespread organization and unlimited but sickly collegiality what the whole government infected, which can only be a continuity of a central authority but undemocratic such as that of a dictatorial monarchy or dictatorship is possible. Such a phenomenon is also possible on the basis of the activities and protection of figures like Marc Dutroux, Michelle Martin and Michel Nihoul. Whether the mafia godfather and the king of Belgium, Albert II, is one and the same person, seen the lush flowering of crime in Belgium, hopefully a silly, but certainly not an inevitable question.

The multiplicity of forgeries of writings and statements with a view to the moral and psychological harm and abuse of defenseless persons, minors and innocent civilians, done explicitly under the watchful eye of both the monarchy and its administrative services as under the eye of particular CD&V and open VLD politicians, who are indeed unconditionally collegial attitude towards the king and monarchy and also toward any indelicate or irresponsible decisions of their colleagues.

Due to the growing and widespread disapproval of the public and the large losses that the parties in the aftermath of their undemocratic politics to the public up, one may assume that there is some opposite has been, what the personal injury for the politicians amply compensated will need to have, so we could speak about pure people treason.

To make matters experienced them that complaint dare to lay down that they in turn be targeted by the authorities, while prosecutors no investigations or prosecutions run.

Revelations of pedophilia by ecclesiastical authorities and the wide dissemination of the phenomenon shown us that children and defenseless too quickly by superiors are abused, raising the question of why such a phenomenon in ecclesiastical authorities leaks, while seemingly at the civil authorities or governments of nothing going on, which is practically impossible. One might, the western development and history in mind, and the omnipresent sexism, and maniacal subjugation and abuse of women and children, specific to the Western individualism, egoism and egocentrism and the associated pursuit of self satisfaction, earlier the opposite may expect. However, it is no secret that in the past the nobles their power and position commonly used to serfs to force their young daughters ls first to them to offer if they want favorable treatment and extra benefits of lords authorities, therefore with noble bastards they could pave the streets. This phenomenon from abuse was also described in the story "Klinkaart" from Piet van Aken, and is as old as Western history. That the phenomenon of child abuse hardly be dammed is also due to the fact that both ecclesiastical and civil officials stand in the first row of abusers of power for their privileged position to exploit and to satisfy.