Professor Emeritus of Psychology andPsychiatry Alexander Charles Evrard (88) gets to swallow criticism of the gaymovement and his "alma mater" after a reader's letter in Snep, thebooklet of the Ghent section of Natuurpunt.
In it he mentions, from a biologicalperspective, homosexuality is a deviation, comparable to 'clubfeet, mongolism, etc.The professor emphasized in his letter to the editor immediately that he hasnothing against the "now-once-so-being" of a gay, but against themodern glorification of a deviation" So far this professor.
The position of the old professor is unquestionable. Homosexuality doesnot fit the nature and differs from it. However, the homosexual is a human likeany other and as a human so similar to his behavior towards others and society.
The promotion of homosexuality is the glorification of an abnormality innature and is not conducive.
In prepubescent we notice that the sexual feelings that develop are notdirectly and clearly to the opposite sex be addressed and there is a tendencyto get their own sex among equal grounding to discover, but this is transientand observable under many various developments.
Under normal circumstances presents curiosity about the opposite sex withattempted rapprochement with the opposite sex.
The individualism that insufficient by pluralism and social intelligenceto social and sexual diversity is addressed, will adjustment to the diversityof the sexes hamper, while the ego-individualism of the white population can becounted as additional disabilities, and adaptation to a society with theopposite sex disturbs. Especially the ego-individualism that animportant part of the western population dominates is often an obstacle toempathize with the feelings and respect for others and the opposite sex.
The development of homosexual is most strongly represented by whiteindividualistic populations while as established phenomenon in East Asian andIndonesian circles practically nonexistent and is extremely rare. Willingness of East Asian and Indonesian men and women to the unnaturalsexual desires of tourists to meet, have nothing to do, and are only aconsequence of their natural urge to resources for survival to recruit one handand otherwise their sexual and emotional indifference outside a durablerelationship. Their lack of individualism and subsequentsubmission to central self-interest play as part of their instinctiveorientation an important role. The rare exceptions are due to mixing withWesterners through infiltration and mixing by neighboring Eastern Europeanterritories, colonialists and tourists.
|