Vertalen, vertaalbureau, vertalingen, vertaler, literatuur, Ezzulia, forum
Vertalen, vertaalbureau, vertalingen, vertaler, literatuur, Ezzulia, forum
26-07-2024
Alcohol is altijd ongezond, ook in beperkte mate
In februari vorig jaar had ik via de lijst detijdlijn@scarlet.be al eens verspreid dat #alcohol #kankerverwekkend is, omdat dat in tegenstelling tot de kankerverwerkkende eigenschappen van tabak weinig bekend is van alcohol. Nu staat vandaag in de krant dat alcohol altijd #ongezond is, ook als je het weinig drinkt, en dat de gevaren ervan lang onderschat zijn omdat de vergelijkende onderzoeken slecht werden uitgevoerd. Het blijkt dat groepen die weinig alcohol dronken omdat ze ziek waren, werden vergeleken met groepen die alcohol dronken die niet ziek waren. Dus wie alcohol meed wegens ziekte, werd vergeleken met wie niet ziek was en alcohol dronk. De onderzoeken weten de ziekte dus toe aan het mijden van alcohol, en af en toe alcohol drinken aan #gezond zijn, terwijl de ziekte niet werd veroorzaakt door alcohol te vermijden.
In een stad waar de zon nooit scheen, leefde een man genaamd Karel. Zijn dagen verstreken in een eindeloze routine, omgeven door de grijze muren van een kantoor dat hem opslokte als een gulzig monster. Hij was slechts een radertje in een immense machine, verloren in de schaduw van bureaucratie.
Op een ochtend ontving Karel een brief. Een brief die zijn alledaagse bestaan plotseling op zijn kop zette. Het was een oproep voor een ontmoeting met een mysterieuze functionaris genaamd 'Meneer H'. Geen nadere uitleg werd gegeven, enkel een tijdstip en een locatie.
Met een mengeling van nieuwsgierigheid en angst begaf Karel zich naar de aangewezen plek. Daar, in een sombere steeg, ontmoette hij Meneer H, een man gehuld in schaduw, met een gezicht dat leek te zijn gebeiteld uit steen.
Meneer H stelde Karel vragen over zijn leven, zijn dromen, zijn angsten. Hij doorboorde Karel met zijn indringende blik, alsof hij recht in zijn ziel kon kijken.
Na een eindeloze dialoog sprak Meneer H tenslotte: "U bent veroordeeld tot een leven van vergetelheid, Karel. Maar er is een uitweg, een pad dat u kunt bewandelen. Echter, de keuze ligt bij u."
Verward en verontrust verliet Karel de ontmoeting, met meer vragen dan antwoorden. Was dit een kans op verlossing of slechts een nieuwe foltering in de eindeloze doolhof van zijn bestaan?
There is a lot published about AI during the last months, also for the general public, but there is an aspect about which you don't hear a lot.
Sabine Hossenfelder (see https://youtu.be/jKx0XwJAj3k) talks about the different USES of AI, and lots of video's and articles do so, but nobody talks about the different ways which are used to make programs act "artificially intelligent".
I suspect there are lots of different types of AI, and the implications for life, society and work might depend very much on the types of AI. Some types of AI give the impression to independently take decisions, as if they think and act for themselves.
Others, however, only seem to improve work already done by humans, like the picture of the black hole improved by AI. (see dr. Becky's video https://youtu.be/RF3P1W1vaYs ).
Others might only be uses to give you lists of recommended products, like video's (YT), but and those might be applications of very simple statistics and links by themes and tags.
But to be able to make those distinctions, one has to know how the so called "black boxes" of AI systems actually works, and that's usually a trade secret. The businesses developping AI are not going to tell it, especially if they have invested billions of dollars in it. And it is the mechanism of AI which might be dangerous or not.
Are human beings a threat to life on planet Earth?
Ik: Are human beings a threat to life on planet Earth?
Chat GPT: Human beings have certainly had a significant impact on the environment and ecosystems of planet Earth, and in some cases, this impact has been detrimental to other forms of life. This impact includes the destruction of natural habitats, pollution of air, water, and soil, overfishing, and overhunting, among others.
However, it is important to note that not all human activities are detrimental to the planet. In fact, many humans are actively working to mitigate the negative impact of human activities and promote sustainability. Additionally, humans have the potential to use technology and innovation to create a more sustainable and harmonious relationship with the planet.
So while it is true that human beings have had a significant impact on the environment, it is not accurate to say that humans are inherently a threat to life on planet Earth. Instead, it is important for humans to be mindful of the impact of their actions and work towards creating a more sustainable and equitable world for all forms of life.
Ik: Could the problems for life on Earth be solved by eradicating human beings?
Chat GPT: No, eradicating human beings is not a solution to the problems facing life on Earth. While it is true that human activities have had a negative impact on the environment, eradicating human beings would also eliminate the potential for humans to work towards creating a more sustainable and equitable world.
Furthermore, it is important to note that humans are not the only species on the planet with a negative impact on the environment. Many other species, such as invasive species or overpopulations of certain animals, can also have negative effects on the environment and other forms of life.
Rather than focusing on eradicating a single species, the solution to the problems facing life on Earth lies in promoting sustainability and protecting biodiversity. This can be achieved through a combination of conservation efforts, sustainable practices, and technological innovation. By working together to create a more sustainable and equitable world, we can ensure a better future for all forms of life on Earth.
Ik: What if eradicating human begins is the only solution?
Chat GPT: While it is highly unlikely that eradicating human beings would ever be considered a viable solution to the problems facing life on Earth, if such a scenario were to occur, it would be an incredibly drastic and unethical course of action. Eradicating an entire species, even one that has had a negative impact on the environment, would be a violation of the fundamental principles of biodiversity and ethical treatment of living beings.
Furthermore, it is important to recognize that the problems facing life on Earth are complex and multifaceted. Many of these problems are the result of systemic issues such as inequality, unsustainable economic systems, and political structures that prioritize profit over environmental protection. Eradicating human beings would not address these underlying issues and would only serve as a temporary solution at best.
Instead, a more effective approach would be to address the root causes of the problems facing life on Earth through collective action, collaboration, and innovation. This includes promoting sustainable practices, protecting biodiversity, and developing technologies that can help to mitigate the negative impact of human activities on the environment. By working together to create a more sustainable and equitable world, we can ensure a better future for all forms of life on Earth.
In June 2022, the European Space Agency (ESA) will launch the JUpiter ICy moons Explorer (Juice) mission, a flagship project that will send a spacecraft to study the Jovian system in detail. This ambitious mission is expected to reveal the secrets of the gas giant and its moons, and contribute to our understanding of the origins and evolution of the Solar System.
Juice will be launched on an Ariane 5 rocket from the Guiana Space Centre in Kourou, French Guiana. The spacecraft is the result of collaboration between ESA and its industrial partners, who have developed the spacecraft and its scientific instruments over the course of several years.
The mission will take about seven years to complete, during which time Juice will travel more than 800 million kilometers to reach its destination. Once it arrives in the Jovian system, it will spend three and a half years orbiting Jupiter and its moons, studying their composition, geology, and atmosphere in detail.
One of the key objectives of the mission is to study the four largest moons of Jupiter: Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto. These icy moons are of particular interest to scientists, as they are believed to harbor vast subsurface oceans that may contain life. Juice will use a suite of scientific instruments, including cameras, spectrometers, and radar, to study these moons in detail, with the goal of determining their habitability.
Juice will also study the atmosphere of Jupiter, which is the largest and most complex planetary atmosphere in the Solar System. The spacecraft will use a suite of instruments to measure the composition, temperature, and dynamics of the atmosphere, providing insights into the processes that shape the planet's weather patterns and magnetic field.
In addition, Juice will study the magnetosphere of Jupiter, which is the region of space around the planet that is dominated by its magnetic field. This field is responsible for creating stunning auroras, and also interacts with the solar wind to create a complex and dynamic environment. By studying the magnetosphere, Juice will help scientists understand how the magnetic fields of planets operate, and how they interact with the surrounding space environment.
The launch of Juice represents a major milestone for ESA and its partners, as well as for the scientific community as a whole. This ambitious mission will provide a wealth of data and insights into the Jovian system, helping us to better understand our place in the universe and the processes that shape our Solar System.
