Fakes, do measures need to be taken or should we promote it?
Fakes, do measures need to be taken or should we promote it?
I have found a paper about fake art and whether it should be tackled or should be welcomed as something acceptable and not bad. The paper gives an economic view on fakes instead of dealing with the art historic view of fakes being something bad. The paper defends its own opinion, comparing the negative and the positive aspects of fake art.
Maybe fakes are wanted in the art industry? Fakes can be a blessing for artists because they can boost up the notoriety of the artist. Its free promotion! It shows that this creation is in demand, the willingness-to-pay raises. Fakes can give a boost to the artist his creativity, enhancing his skills. A lot of old masters use the technique of copying to improve their talent.
Not everything about fakes, as may be suspected, is positive. Fakes creates uncertainty for future buyers. This leads to the fact that some auction houses and branded art dealers promote the authenticity of the works they are selling. Fakes can lead to a market of organized crime.
The paper really changed my point of view towards (illegal) fakes. We should be more positive if we find an extremely good copy of a work, instead of being disappointed for what reason? we should be grateful that such good painters still exist.
Reference: Frey, B.S., 2000. Art fakes what fakes? Working Paper Series of the University of Zurich, No. 14, 1-18.
