Victor Erimita over
nefaste invloed van deconstructie, poststructuralisme, relativisme,
in het
onderwijs
We should all be "guardians" of what is of lasting
value from our cultural inheritance. What I am objecting to is the adolescent
rejection of everything from the past, which has too often been the case with
narrowly ideological manifestation of "deconstruction,"
"poststructuralism" and various other labels of a mentality that
seems to say that our entire culture must be destroyed in favor of some
unspecified superior way
Deconstruction began as an examination of contexts, a way to
understand levels of complexities previously unxamined in the assertion of
simplistic truths. The problem is that it has been widely abused. It has become
a way to overlay anything and everything with with various ideologcal agendas.
It has become a way for lazy, intellectually degenerate "scholars" to
pick apart the work of greater minds without having to create anything
themselves. And it has collapsed into relativism, applying standards of
criticism to everything else it refuses to apply to itself. Its proponents rarely
allow themselves to be deconstructed in the way they gleefully and
pretentiously do to others. There are no truths, only contexts, except the
truths I assert, which are true in all cases and contexts.
The humanities and social sciences in American universities
have devalued themselves by devaluing the subjects they used to teach. Those
"disciplines" have become increasingly about reciting the
race/class/gender political creed and indulging the childish
"deconstruction" narcissistic delusions of a degenerate academic class.
|