Interessantes zum Nachlesen:
Enthalten: Professor Messler sieht (wie so oft) überhaupt
kein Handlungsbedarf, geschweige denn: justiziables. Die Zeugin (und ihre
Augenzeugen) geben nicht nach und lassen sich nicht veräppeln. Sie argumentieren
(zurecht) weiter gegen die Machenschaften (im SV, sowie in der WUSV), Machenschaften
die viele andere Menschen auch beanstanden. Wie viele Hunde wurden über die
Jahrzehnte nicht durch Körungen und Prüfungen gemogelt, alleine des Geldes und
der Beziehungen wegen?
Man wäscht
sich wie Pontius Pilatus die Hände, gibt zu, dass es schon immer
Unstimmigkeiten und grosse Kontroversen gegeben hat, verweist aber im Schreiben
auf künftige Gesetzgebung und meint, dass nur in Deutschland durchgeführte
Körungen erlaubt sein werden (In order to obtain a breed permission with
recognition for the German studbook of the SV (SV sphere of influence) only
breed surveys that were carried out in Germany will be considered in the future
to come.), vergisst
dabei aber völlig, dass es vielmals die DEUTSCHE Zuchtrichter aus der Heimat
sind, die die Regeln im Ausland nicht einhalten/eingehalten haben wie sie
müssten! Inkompetenz oder Vetternwirtschaft? Wir lassen die Frage mal offen im
Raum stehen und referieren nach der Aussage von Willibald Gruber (MEHR als 30
Jahre SV-Zuchtrichter!) im Film Pflegefall Schäferhund (siehe dort), dass man
um hoch zu kommen im SV unbedingt die richtigen Beziehungen braucht.
MEINE Meinung
zum Fall Sportsfreundin Maria del Carmen Marin (Argentina) und Teubert: Ein Mann
(Präsident) der ein Mann (Präsident) ist, würde den Hund einfach sofort erneut
vorführen lassen und der Hund müsste (wie jeder andere auch) immer wieder erneut
unter Beweis stellen können, dass er die Körordnung total beherrscht.
Bei Facebook wurde folgendes von Messler gepostet:
Electronic correspondence dated August 03, 2018. However, your latest statement
did not reveal any new aspects with regard to the issue you addressed. Mr.
Teubert never doubted the veritableness of the video recordings you provided us
with. He informed us that the dog handler did not respond to his instruction to
interrupt the exercise even though the interpreter on site the examination area
did actively interfere in this respect. The dog handler was obviously a native
speaker from Italy meanwhile the interpreter only speaks Spanish. According to
Mr. Teubert he informed the dog handler by the end of her presentation that the
dog showed a lack in terms of obedience during part one of the examination, and
that this part still needed to be repeated (paragraph 6.3., no. 5 of the SV
Breed Survey Regulations). He further informed us that this was carried out
accordingly in a correct fashion at a later time. Please allow me at this instant to point that problems in terms of
breed surveys abroad have been an issue within the SV for many years and often
entailed rather controversial discussions. On principle, breed surveys are
supposed to be subject to the sovereign decisions of the respective national
clubs. The validity of the results of breed surveys taken abroad in terms of
the German field of sovereignty for breeding has become void as a result of the
vote of the delegates to the General Annual Meeting of the Verein für Deutsche
Schäferhunde (SV) e.V. in Mai 2018, and will become legally binding as soon as
the registration court will have confirmed the entry hereof. In order to obtain
a breed permission with recognition for the German studbook of the SV (SV
sphere of influence) only breed surveys that were carried out in Germany will
be considered in the future to come. Concluding, I would like to refer you to
the SV Code of Judicial Procedure, in particular to paragraph 9. If you are
determined to insist upon the processing of your complaint we would pass the
case on to the propriate SV court at federal level. In this case, please kindly
let us know whether you wish us to proceed in that respect, and if so, please
also provide us with the details of a contact person. Furthermore, please let
us have your personal membership number within the SV. Thank you very much. With kind regards,
Professor Dr Heinrich Meßler SV-President
Videoaufnamen mit der Bemerkung:
Maranello sigue sin
conducción hoy!!! Asi estamos hoy en Argentina!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6NDyw7i0wI&feature=youtu.be
Antwort von Maria del Carmen Marin an Messler:
Dear Mr. Messler
There is a real shame your answer and see that nobody tried
hard enough to improve the breed that I love so much. I was hoping for another
answer from the SV president but I see now that nobody does anything to remove
the corrupted judges. On the contrary, I see that they try to help them and
people like me, that know for sure about the corruption, no help is received !
I only tell the truth and I am asking you to show me the video of Maranellos
dog. Never did and he is not doing it. Judge Teubert is lying because he never
tried to repeat. We were all the witnesses there and did not happen like you
say it did. Therefore I am respectfully requesting you the video showing it. I
want somebody to take in consideration what I am saying and I will not stop
until the real truth is out from the shadows. Attached is the video of
Maranellos dog doing what he does, NOTHING! Video includes the president
Pasarelli (as a Händler) and he does nothing. I will be expecting your answer.
Thank you. Regards, Maria del Carmen Marin - DNI:14.947.348
Enviado desde Email app for Hotmail
14-08-2018 om 13:08
geschreven door jantie
|